On 09.01.20 19:01, Daniel.Sun wrote:
Hi Jochen,
I am still thinking about how to improve indy performance further in
the method overload cases, e.g.
```
def same(String obj) { return obj }
def same(int obj) { return obj }
def same(float obj) { return obj }
for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++)
Final call for any changes before I make some new releases.
Cheers, Paul.
Hi Paul,
I suggest the following PRs could be included in final 3.0 RC.
1) PR#1135[1] for GROOVY-8298 is ready to merge
2) PR#1137[2] for GROOVY-8296 LGTM
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
[1] https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1135
[2] https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/1137
-
Apache Groovy com
Hi Jochen,
> If you want to get the maximum performance then I would suggest to
work
with the guards instead of falling back to a hashed map.
Thanks for your suggestions :-)
After we constructed the following "tree" MH with guards, we have to set
target to link the MH to the related
Dear development community,
I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.4.18 bug fix release!
This release includes 3 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the changelog:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12345496
Tag:
https://gitbox.apache.
Dear development community,
I am happy to start the VOTE thread for a Groovy 2.5.9 release!
This release includes 30 bug fixes/improvements as outlined in the
changelog:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12318123&version=12345981
Tag:
https://gitbox.apache.org/repo
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
-
Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
Twitter: @daniel_sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
+1 (binding)
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
-
Apache Groovy committer & PMC member
Blog: http://blog.sunlan.me
Twitter: @daniel_sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
