Re: Gant is to be deleted, or will someone preserve it?

On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:50 +0100, Cédric Champeau wrote: > An alternative is to "archive" the project in GitHub. It's going to be > read-only (see the "settings" tab). > Gant organisation now with two owners not one, and the two repositories archived as proposed. -- Russel. ===

[GitHub] glaforge opened a new pull request #6: remove g+ links

glaforge opened a new pull request #6: remove g+ links URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy-website/pull/6 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the

[GitHub] glaforge opened a new pull request #5: remove g+ links

glaforge opened a new pull request #5: remove g+ links URL: https://github.com/apache/groovy-website/pull/5 This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service. To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the

Re: [PROPOSAL]About creating open collective for Groovy programming language in the name of Groovy Community

On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 6:30 PM Jennifer Strater wrote: > Hi Roman, > > This thread is about finding out whether we are allowed to use > OpenSourceCollective(OSC) to fund/reward contributions to the Apache Groovy > project. The response we are expecting is an unconditional yes, yes with > clearly