Re: Gant is to be deleted, or will someone preserve it?

2019-02-02 Thread Guillaume Laforge
Why deleting it? Keep it for posterity! :-) On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 8:29 AM Russel Winder wrote: > Hi, > > Way back in 2006, Gant was an experiment in scheduling Ant tasks and > attempted > to be a build system. Hans Dockter experiment a lot with it, but in the end > Gant was not the way forward

Re: Gant is to be deleted, or will someone preserve it?

2019-02-02 Thread Russel Winder
On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:18 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > Why deleting it? > Keep it for posterity! :-) Someone, or some people, then needs to step up and volunteer to be an owner of the Gant organisation on GitHub. -- Russel. === Dr Russel Winder

Re: Gant is to be deleted, or will someone preserve it?

2019-02-02 Thread Cédric Champeau
An alternative is to "archive" the project in GitHub. It's going to be read-only (see the "settings" tab). Le sam. 2 févr. 2019 à 09:46, Russel Winder a écrit : > On Sat, 2019-02-02 at 09:18 +0100, Guillaume Laforge wrote: > > Why deleting it? > > Keep it for posterity! :-) > > Someone, or some

Status of GPars

2019-02-02 Thread Russel Winder
Hi, I have come to the decision to stop working on GPars. I have done very little over the last year anyway, there has been no interest at all from the Groovy community, and I am not doing much with Groovy or even the JVM these days – except perhaps some Kotlin for writing the DLanguage CLion plug

Re: Status of GPars

2019-02-02 Thread Wilson MacGyver
Thank you for all your hard work over the years! Much appreciated On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 1:55 PM Russel Winder wrote: > Hi, > > I have come to the decision to stop working on GPars. I have done very > little > over the last year anyway, there has been no interest at all from the > Groovy > commun

Re: Status of GPars

2019-02-02 Thread Simon Sadedin
Understandable but sorry to hear it all the same. For the record, I make a lot of use of GPars and it is extremely reliable and solid. I've been on the verge of submitting a pull request to add back-pressure to the actor classes since that's my main pain point in using the library. Thanks for all