I got caught up with conference activities and didn't finish all the bugs
I wanted for RC1. Now that I'm back, I'll work on getting the RC1 release
ready over the coming days.
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 9:41 PM, Paul King wrote:
>
> I am hoping to do the first RC release of 2.5.0 late this week or
+1!
I've just read the documentation and it's clear and elegant. Great job!
Really looking forward to seeing it integrated!
It's a very nice and needed addition to the GDK :-)
Guillaume
On Sun, Mar 18, 2018 at 6:03 AM, Paul King wrote:
> Looks good at first glance. Please go ahead with the PR
Merged.
https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/674
Cheers,
Daniel.Sun
--
Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
Cool!
On Mon, Mar 19, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Daniel.Sun wrote:
> Merged.
> https://github.com/apache/groovy/pull/674
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel.Sun
>
>
>
> --
> Sent from: http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Groovy-Dev-f372993.html
>
--
Guillaume Laforge
Apache Groovy committer & PMC Vice-President
Devel
Thanks for the feedback and the pull! Glad there was consensus on the
strict upper bound view for upto/downto. Everything was essentially
straightforward one liners except for those two methods.
Daniel, in regards to being considered as a champion candidate, that's
flattering, but being able to co
Hi Joe,
> Daniel, in regards to being considered as a champion candidate, that's
> flattering, but being able to contribute to Groovy core is honor enough.
You deserve it :-)
> I've benefited from Groovy for years and I've long wanted to give back to
> the community.
So do I.
Cheers,
Daniel
On Tue, Mar 20, 2018 at 2:19 AM, Joe Wolf wrote:
> [...] Glad there was consensus on the strict upper bound view for
> upto/downto. [...]
>
Being at the conference the last week, I didn't get time to look at that
properly. It worries me that we'd have a different semantics for
upto/downto compar
