Hi Marcin,
Some modules have used the groovyx.* namespace in the past.
It's somewhat semi-standard, in the sense that it's already in use, at
least.
It's not dependent upon Apache or the defunct Codehaus foundation, and
there's no constraint from Sonatype on those.
If using groovyx, it'd be good t
Hi everyone,
I am ready to push out a 2.4.8 release. Any other last minute changes
that need to be done? If I don't hear anything further, I'll do the
first steps for the release (my) tomorrow and prepare some candidate
artefacts and a [VOTE] thread.
Cheers, Paul.
Wondering if https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7472 was applied
to the 2.4.x branch. It appears to be fixed for 2.5.x.
Would be great to have it in 2.4.8. It's an innocuous feature however I've
found myself needing it a couple of times already in the past months.
Cheers,
Andres
--
On 2016-12-28 11:49, Guillaume Laforge wrote:
> Hi Marcin,
>
> Some modules have used the groovyx.* namespace in the past.
> It's somewhat semi-standard, in the sense that it's already in use, at
> least.
> It's not dependent upon Apache or the defunct Codehaus foundation, and
> there's no constra
