I am just wondering what people's thoughts are on the different
approaches different parts of Groovy take for method resolution when
multiple methods are matched.
Given this code:
import groovy.transform.CompileStatic
interface FooA {}
interface FooB {}
class FooAB implements FooA, FooB
I guess I haven't looked into that part of JDK9 just yet. My first
reaction would be to try to see what work would be involved with the
"special handling". Keeping the existing behaviour (or close to it
with perhaps a few caveats) would be ideal but has to be weighed up
with the amount of work requ
On 27.08.2016 12:28, Paul King wrote:
I guess I haven't looked into that part of JDK9 just yet. My first
reaction would be to try to see what work would be involved with the
"special handling". Keeping the existing behaviour (or close to it
with perhaps a few caveats) would be ideal but has to be
On 27.08.2016 12:22, Paul King wrote:
I am just wondering what people's thoughts are on the different
approaches different parts of Groovy take for method resolution when
multiple methods are matched.
Given this code:
import groovy.transform.CompileStatic
interface FooA {}
interface F
