I'm using groovy.util.DelegatingScript to realize a simple DSL. It works
quite well and the implementation was straight forward.
Now I would like to extend my DSL by more words. Usually, this would be
done by implementing each word as method in the delegate class.
Instead I would like to split t
Hi Paulk, Is there any alternative approach of doing this without
XmlUtil.serialize since am facing few jar issues.
--
View this message in context:
http://groovy.329449.n5.nabble.com/Iterate-ArrayList-over-XML-Groovy-tp5734628p5734680.html
Sent from the Groovy Dev mailing list archive at Nabbl
On 16.08.2016 10:45, Gerrit Telkamp wrote:
I'm using groovy.util.DelegatingScript to realize a simple DSL. It works
quite well and the implementation was straight forward.
Now I would like to extend my DSL by more words. Usually, this would be
done by implementing each word as method in the del
Jochen, thank you for your approach!
It seems that question was a bit incomplete.
I should have asked: Is it planned to include a list of Delegate Classes
by groovy itself, or is the preferred way to "roll your own" on
application level by the existing groovy.util.DelegatingScript?
BTW, the "Mis
On 12.08.2016 17:39, daniel_sun wrote:
Hi all,
The option
pattern(http://www.codecommit.com/blog/scala/the-option-pattern) is very
useful to improve the robustness of program by avoiding NPE. Scala and Rust
have build in the
pattern(http://www.tutorialspoint.com/scala/scala_options.htm
Hi Jochen,
Thanks for your reviewing the codes. I think you are right about the
difference between Java8's Optional and the proposed Option. As Java8 has
supported option pattern and Groovy will migrate to Java8, there is no need to
integrate the library and DGM will be better :)
B
