Re: Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread Russel Winder
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 16:20 -0700, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > +1 [binding] > > signature is ok > sha1 is ok  > rat is ok > builds and produces functional binaries > > One small note: sha1 and md5 aren't considered secure, it'd make > sense to > switch into gpg generated checksums, perhaps. I can

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread Russel Winder
On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 19:20 +0200, Cédric Champeau wrote: > […] > > [ ] +1 Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7 > [ ]  0 I don't have a strong opinion about this, but I assume it's ok > [ ] -1 Do not release Apache Groovy 2.4.7 I cannot check the artefacts directly myself just now, others can and will I a

Re: Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread jim northrop
what does this mean to the avg hacker ? do we need to fix our kit anyway ? On 4 June 2016 at 10:50, Russel Winder wrote: > On Fri, 2016-06-03 at 16:20 -0700, Konstantin Boudnik wrote: > > +1 [binding] > > > > signature is ok > > sha1 is ok > > rat is ok > > builds and produces functional binarie

Re: Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread Russel Winder
On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 10:53 +0200, jim northrop wrote: > what does this mean to the avg hacker ? do we need to fix our kit > anyway ? >  For those who download and check signatures, SHA1 and MD5 are unreliable and provide very weak confidence. I am not sure what stance Gradle, Maven, and Ant take

Re: Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread Mario Garcia
+1 On 4 Jun 2016 11:54, "Russel Winder" wrote: > On Sat, 2016-06-04 at 10:53 +0200, jim northrop wrote: > > what does this mean to the avg hacker ? do we need to fix our kit > > anyway ? > > > > For those who download and check signatures, SHA1 and MD5 are > unreliable and provide very weak confi

Re: Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread Sean Gilligan
On 6/4/16 2:54 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > > For those who download and check signatures, SHA1 and MD5 are > unreliable and provide very weak confidence. > > I am not sure what stance Gradle, Maven, and Ant take on signature > checking, do they do any signature checking at all? The only signature

Re: Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread Sean Gilligan
On 6/4/16 2:54 AM, Russel Winder wrote: > > For those who download and check signatures, SHA1 and MD5 are > unreliable and provide very weak confidence. > > I am not sure what stance Gradle, Maven, and Ant take on signature > checking, do they do any signature checking at all? > The only signature

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Groovy 2.4.7

2016-06-04 Thread Guillaume Laforge
+1 On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 7:20 PM, Cédric Champeau wrote: > Dear community, > > I am happy to start the VOTE thread for the long awaited Apache Groovy > 2.4.7! > This release includes numerous bugfixes for which list can be found here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?pro