The TC builds for JDK7 haven't run since Jan 15. Was looking to point
someone to the snapshots on jfrog and noticed they hadn't been updated in a
while.
John
Hi! Does anyone have any information on the status of Groovy 3.0? Thanks!
Sent from my iPhone
--
Clark Richey
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
240.252.7507
cl...@factgem.com
WWW.FACTGEM.COM
This message and any included attachments are property of FactGem and its
affiliates, and are intended only for t
We are still working on getting 2.5 out the door. Only a little bit of
experimental/spike work has gone in regards to 3.0 .
Cheers, Paul.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:22 AM, Clark Richey wrote:
> Hi! Does anyone have any information on the status of Groovy 3.0? Thanks!
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>
Thanks. I just haven't been able to find much information in development status
since the website changes occurred and I was vaguely concerned.
Sent from my iPhone
>
--
Clark Richey
CHIEF TECHNOLOGY OFFICER
240.252.7507
cl...@factgem.com
WWW.FACTGEM.COM
This message and any included attachm
Yes, we spoke about putting back some kind of roadmap page that was in the
old website (and I have an action to make some progress in that regard).
But we didn't want to make the roadmap unrealistic either, so we want to
get the wording right.
Cheers, Paul.
On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 5:59 AM, Clark
We also fear the big 3.0 release, in a way :-)
It's always been on a far horizon, as a kind of target to reach, and also
as a release where we want to put breaking changes.
But some other languages like Python faced issues with a big milestone like
that, as users stayed on the old 2.x branch foreve
Understood. My concern, and I believe it mirrors a concern held by others, is
that on the surface with no indications of beta releases, road maps or any
current development activity it looks like Groovy development stalled when
Codehaus dropped its support.
I agree that you don't want an unrea
Hi, Guillaume.
In my very humble opinion (and it should be noticed that I'm very far
away to know the Groovy community and language internals as well as you
do), the Python 2.x vs 3.x 'war' was due to mainly a very slow adoption
of the 3.x branch from the different third-party libraries. Even
On 29.01.2016 00:09, Clark Richey wrote:
Understood. My concern, and I believe it mirrors a concern held by
others, is that on the surface with no indications of beta releases,
road maps or any current development activity it looks like Groovy
development stalled when Codehaus dropped its suppo
On 29.01.2016 00:16, Edinson E. Padrón U. wrote:
Hi, Guillaume.
In my very humble opinion (and it should be noticed that I'm very far
away to know the Groovy community and language internals as well as you
do), the Python 2.x vs 3.x 'war' was due to mainly a very slow adoption
of the 3.x branc
10 matches
Mail list logo
