Re: Status of GPars

2019-02-04 Thread Paolo Di Tommaso
Indeed. Gpars is an amazing and super reliable piece of software. I would be happy to contribute to keep it building and running. Cheers, Paolo On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 3:16 PM Paul King wrote: > Thanks for all your efforts Russel, GPars wouldn't have become the very > useful library it is tod

Re: Status of GPars

2019-02-04 Thread Paul King
Thanks for all your efforts Russel, GPars wouldn't have become the very useful library it is today without your efforts. You are right though that things have changed. I'll try to find time to see what still builds with a view to doing a new release (with perhaps much functionality pruned). Cheer

Re: Status of GPars

2019-02-02 Thread Simon Sadedin
Understandable but sorry to hear it all the same. For the record, I make a lot of use of GPars and it is extremely reliable and solid. I've been on the verge of submitting a pull request to add back-pressure to the actor classes since that's my main pain point in using the library. Thanks for all

Re: Status of GPars

2019-02-02 Thread Wilson MacGyver
Thank you for all your hard work over the years! Much appreciated On Sat, Feb 2, 2019 at 1:55 PM Russel Winder wrote: > Hi, > > I have come to the decision to stop working on GPars. I have done very > little > over the last year anyway, there has been no interest at all from the > Groovy > commun

Status of GPars

2019-02-02 Thread Russel Winder
Hi, I have come to the decision to stop working on GPars. I have done very little over the last year anyway, there has been no interest at all from the Groovy community, and I am not doing much with Groovy or even the JVM these days – except perhaps some Kotlin for writing the DLanguage CLion plug