Re: The long path to a new MOP

2016-08-09 Thread Jochen Theodorou
On 09.08.2016 04:08, Paul King wrote: Just a possible alternative tweak to your idea. The Gradle project has an Incubating annotation that can be added to classes, methods, etc. That let's you pick a final package name now that won't need to change later and we can remove the @Incubating once t

Re: The long path to a new MOP

2016-08-08 Thread Paul King
Just a possible alternative tweak to your idea. The Gradle project has an Incubating annotation that can be added to classes, methods, etc. That let's you pick a final package name now that won't need to change later and we can remove the @Incubating once things settle down. I don't mind having gro

Re: The long path to a new MOP

2016-08-08 Thread John Wagenleitner
On Mon, Aug 8, 2016 at 7:34 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > > > On 07.08.2016 18:09, John Wagenleitner wrote: > >> I think that's a good idea. Having a new package under the normal src >> directory in master with some sort of feature toggle I think would be >> good and would be easier for some to

Re: The long path to a new MOP

2016-08-08 Thread Jochen Theodorou
On 07.08.2016 18:09, John Wagenleitner wrote: I think that's a good idea. Having a new package under the normal src directory in master with some sort of feature toggle I think would be good and would be easier for some to help test or contribute. With this work and with jigsaw coming it woul

Re: The long path to a new MOP

2016-08-07 Thread Jochen Theodorou
On 07.08.2016 19:37, Jesper Steen Møller wrote: Hi all, On 7. aug. 2016, at 13.49, Jochen Theodorou wrote: Since this will take several normal releases I think just using a branch will not do here. Because keeping them just in sync will probably take up most of the time I would normally u

Re: The long path to a new MOP

2016-08-07 Thread Jesper Steen Møller
Hi all, > On 7. aug. 2016, at 13.49, Jochen Theodorou wrote: > Since this will take several normal releases I think just using a branch will > not do here. Because keeping them just in sync will probably take up most of > the time I would normally use to implement this. So I was wondering... w

Re: The long path to a new MOP

2016-08-07 Thread John Wagenleitner
I think that's a good idea. Having a new package under the normal src directory in master with some sort of feature toggle I think would be good and would be easier for some to help test or contribute. With this work and with jigsaw coming it would be nice to release a 2.5 and get master on a pat