The workaround is not to use static compilation for the annotation; it
wouldn't do anything anyway.
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025, 18:53 Saravanan Palanichamy
wrote:
> It's under Static compilation. I have raised a ticket for this issue. I am
> not sure if there are any work arounds for this issue
>
> re
It's under Static compilation. I have raised a ticket for this issue. I am
not sure if there are any work arounds for this issue
regards
Saravanan
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 6:32 PM Milles, Eric (TR Technology) via dev <
dev@groovy.apache.org> wrote:
> You should be able to use "default []". I don
Yes, those errors are with type checking turned on. We have special
handling for that elsewhere but maybe not here yet?
On Tue, Apr 15, 2025 at 11:02 PM Milles, Eric (TR Technology) via dev <
dev@groovy.apache.org> wrote:
> You should be able to use "default []". I don't think it supports
> "de
You should be able to use "default []". I don't think it supports "default new
Class[0]". Is this under Static Type Checking or Static Compilation?
NOTE: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-11492 item 3 covers the
missing "default {}" support.
From:
