Thanks for the comments everyone. There looks like there is strong
consensus, so I'll start the official [VOTE] thread. Please make your
informal +1's here official by replying to that thread.
WRT Jenkins/Pipeline, I will comment on their open issue:
https://issues.jenkins.io/browse/JENKINS-53372
@groovy.apache.org
Subject: [EXT] Re: [DISCUSS] EOL for Groovy 2.4.x
External Email: Use caution with links and attachments.
> I would consider 2.5 for EOL as well
Good idea.
On 2024/06/28 12:38:54 Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> +1 out with it
>
> I would consider 2.5 for EOL as well
&g
That's the one. Agreed that I don't think there is likely to be any
showstopper, since Pipeline doesn't use any esoteric syntax, but somebody
has to do it, and we should at least alert the Jenkins people before we EOL
a core component of a major CI tool.
On Sat, Jun 29, 2024, 06:14 Jochen Theodoro
On 28.06.24 18:35, Christopher Smith wrote:
Heads up that Jenkins (as of plugin parent 4.83, and at least
workflow-cps is still on 4.80) still uses Groovy 2.4.21. The CPS plugin
is a drastic ASTT, and it's core to modern Jenkins pipelines.
you mean this I think:
https://github.com/jenkinsci/wor
Heads up that Jenkins (as of plugin parent 4.83, and at least workflow-cps
is still on 4.80) still uses Groovy 2.4.21. The CPS plugin is a drastic
ASTT, and it's core to modern Jenkins pipelines.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2024 at 9:09 PM Paul King wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Groovy 2.4.x hasn't been something
> I would consider 2.5 for EOL as well
Good idea.
On 2024/06/28 12:38:54 Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> +1 out with it
>
> I would consider 2.5 for EOL as well
>
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Groovy 2.4.x hasn't been something we have progressed for some time.
> > The last "real" commit to the GROOVY_2_4_X
+1 out with it
I would consider 2.5 for EOL as well
Hi folks,
Groovy 2.4.x hasn't been something we have progressed for some time.
The last "real" commit to the GROOVY_2_4_X branch and the last release
(2.4.21) were both in Dec 2020.
For reference, 2.4.x supports back to JDK 1.6 while 2.5.x (
+1, it's high time we EOL it!
Guillaume
On Fri, Jun 28, 2024 at 6:37 AM Daniel Sun wrote:
> +1
>
> Groovy 2.4.x is too old and lacks maintenance. It's strongly recommended
> to use Groovy 4+.
>
> Cheers,
> Daniel Sun
>
> On 2024/06/28 02:08:57 Paul King wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > Groovy 2.4.
+1
Groovy 2.4.x is too old and lacks maintenance. It's strongly recommended to use
Groovy 4+.
Cheers,
Daniel Sun
On 2024/06/28 02:08:57 Paul King wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> Groovy 2.4.x hasn't been something we have progressed for some time.
> The last "real" commit to the GROOVY_2_4_X branch and
