Hi Gerrit,
When you say that a newer DelegateScript class is a muc more elegant
way, than doing with MissingMethodException... well that would be still
how it is implemented in the end. So not more elegant, just hidden in my
opinion.
Planed is nothing in this direction right now. I have a bi
Jochen, thank you for your approach!
It seems that question was a bit incomplete.
I should have asked: Is it planned to include a list of Delegate Classes
by groovy itself, or is the preferred way to "roll your own" on
application level by the existing groovy.util.DelegatingScript?
BTW, the "Mis
On 16.08.2016 10:45, Gerrit Telkamp wrote:
I'm using groovy.util.DelegatingScript to realize a simple DSL. It works
quite well and the implementation was straight forward.
Now I would like to extend my DSL by more words. Usually, this would be
done by implementing each word as method in the del
I'm using groovy.util.DelegatingScript to realize a simple DSL. It works
quite well and the implementation was straight forward.
Now I would like to extend my DSL by more words. Usually, this would be
done by implementing each word as method in the delegate class.
Instead I would like to split t