I looked into what would be needed to backport GROOVY-7427 and it
turns out we'd need to bring across half of GROOVY-7087 as well. So,
while it can be done, I am kind of -1 on such a change and +1 on
getting the 2.5 beta out.
Cheers, Paul.
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 8:29 AM, Cédric Champeau
wrote:
For Groovy Eclipse we have no choice: the Eclipse compiler is a fork of the
Groovy compiler with Eclipse specific code. That's just how it works: new
Groovy version, new Groovy Eclipse version.
2016-02-16 22:56 GMT+01:00 chrylis :
> > Keeping small backwards compatible enhancements out of bugfix
Am 16.02.2016 um 22:56 schrieb chrylis:
Do you consider all micros to be "bugfix releases", or are some of
them fixes and some of them small enhancements? In Groovy, there's a
tendency for minor updates to require cascading changes to other
components (e.g., GRECLIPSE, Spock).
From 2.0 on the
> Keeping small backwards compatible enhancements out of bugfix releases
> is good as long as there are frequent non-bugfix releases.
Do you consider all micros to be "bugfix releases", or are some of them
fixes and some of them small enhancements? In Groovy, there's a tendency for
minor updates t
No objections either.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:04 PM, Paul King wrote:
> Any objections to Chris' request? The Jira he referred to is a small
> backwards compatible enhancement (rather than bug fix). We'd normally
> keep this for new releases but it does open up much nicer Spring
> integration
Hurrah ! Thank YOU John !
thx jim
On 16 February 2016 at 21:02, John Wagenleitner wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> I think the file you might be looking for is:
>
> src/main/org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/StringGroovyMethods.java
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pascal Schumacher <
> pascalschumac..
Be glad to open a JIRA - once i learn how ;-}
must do some homework !
thanx
jim
On 16 February 2016 at 19:36, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> not sure what you mean by "String.metadata function"?
>
> If you like to contribute code to groovy open a jira ticket and send us a
> pull request.
No objections here and I too think it would be nice to release a 2.5 beta
as well.
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Pascal Schumacher wrote:
> Keeping small backwards compatible enhancements out of bugfix releases is
> good as long as there are frequent non-bugfix releases.
>
> As I there are no
Keeping small backwards compatible enhancements out of bugfix releases
is good as long as there are frequent non-bugfix releases.
As I there are no frequent non-bugfix releases at the moment :(, I have
no objections to back-porting.
BTW: I think we should release 2.5-beta anyway.
Cheers,
Pas
Any objections to Chris' request? The Jira he referred to is a small
backwards compatible enhancement (rather than bug fix). We'd normally
keep this for new releases but it does open up much nicer Spring
integration options, so I am not too worried about back-porting this
one.
Other opinions?
Che
Hi Jim,
I think the file you might be looking for is:
src/main/org/codehaus/groovy/runtime/StringGroovyMethods.java
On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Pascal Schumacher <
pascalschumac...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Hi Jim,
>
> not sure what you mean by "String.metadata function"?
>
> If you like to
>Please backport every fix you think is worth having on the 2.4.x branch
asap.
If Paul has the bandwidth for the backport, it would be very helpful to me
to have the enhancement to @TupleConstructor in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7427 for 2.4.6.
--
View this message in context:
Hi Jim,
not sure what you mean by "String.metadata function"?
If you like to contribute code to groovy open a jira ticket and send us
a pull request.
Cheers,
Pascal
Am 16.02.2016 um 10:18 schrieb jim northrop:
Hi Pascal
could you pls point me to where i can donate a tiny piece of
String.me
Hi Pascal
could you pls point me to where i can donate a tiny piece of
String.metadata function ?
thx
jim
On 16 February 2016 at 08:12, Pascal Schumacher
wrote:
> I fixed https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GROOVY-7742 by reverting as
> Shils and John suggested in the discussion of
> https
14 matches
Mail list logo