I think the future of Grails will be like this. Plugins will no longer
exist! At least most of them will not be needed. Therefore, artifact names
will not include the *plugin* prefix or suffix.
I agree with the naming proposed by Mattias, but I think the groupId should
include some specific categor
ution.
> >
> > consolidation of the profiles would be great. Do you have any time to
> > work on this task?
> >
> > On 2025/03/20 00:48:09 Michael Yan wrote:
> > > If using 'org.apache.grails.profiles' as groupId, why do we need to
> add
> &g
If using 'org.apache.grails.profiles' as groupId, why do we need to add
the prefix grails-profile-? The profile artifact will not be packaged in
the final distributions.
Also I think we don't need so many profiles, some of theme can be merged,
included base. Maybe we also can make angular, react,
I withdraw my veto. My vote is 0.
On 2025/03/22 03:00:08 Michael Yan wrote:
> [-1]，specifically, I disagree with 1, 2, 10
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:02 AM James Daugherty
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to
IMO, just changing org.grails to org.apache.grails is the fastest way to
release M4.
On 2025/03/21 17:52:18 James Daugherty wrote:
> I'll start a vote thread in 3 hours if there isn't any more feedback so we
> can get snapshot builds working next week.
>
> It's rather critical we get this done s
A major and exciting milestone.🎉
James Fredley 于2025年3月18日周二 20:14写道：
> This move will start today.
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-26642
>
> On 2025/03/13 18:13:57 James Fredley wrote:
> > A JIRA ticket has been submitted with ASF infrastructure to migrate the
> following reposito
ar 19, 2025 at 9:01 PM James Fredley
> wrote:
>
> > That is a great point about the profile not being included in the final
> > distribution.
> >
> > consolidation of the profiles would be great. Do you have any time to
> > work on this task?
> >
> >
[-1]，specifically, I disagree with 1, 2, 10
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:02 AM James Daugherty
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to propose that we move forward
> with the maven coordinate changes so we can begin snapshot builds under the
> ASF namespace.
>
> I've d
create a project in Grails Shell:
grails create-app com.mycompany.blog
grails forge create-app com.mycompany.blog
grails spring init -- // to create spring boot projects
Michael Yan 于2025年3月1日周六 08:11写道：
> I still recommend using only the Grails Shell, and Grails Forge using
> Microna
orge addition, grails-forge CI could also update the grails-core release
> page with the final packaged distribution.
>
> Just sharing my thoughts to keep the discussion going - open to
> suggestions on how we can make this work smoothly!
>
> On 2025/03/01 00:34:46 Michael Yan wrote:
When will the Grails Repositories be migrated to Apache GitHub Organizaton?
Whether they will sync to Apache GitBox?
I'm still getting familiar with the development process for the Apache way,
do I have to use JIRA to submit the issue first?
James Fredley 于2025年3月7日周五 02:29写道：
> https://github.c
rocess making it easier to handle. Good idea!
>
> On 2025/03/03 11:40:46 Michael Yan wrote:
> > Create a new repository: grails-distribution, writing a Gradle task or
> > shell script to merge the two (grails-core-7.0.x.zip and
> > grails-forge-7.0.x.zip) into a one distri
Recently, I have implemented that the templates in the profiles can support
the Groovy Template Engine, which can reduce or merge some of the profiles,
and combined with the Application Templates I implemented before, I believe
that it can support more complex configuration and flexible project
ske
I still recommend using only the Grails Shell, and Grails Forge using
Micronaut and Picocli, although it supports packaging native images, but
also loses the dynamic nature of Groovy and does not support the ability to
extend the CLI by the user.
If we had to provide something like Spring Initializ
' version:
https://github.com/apache/grails-core/pull/14080
On 2025/03/22 04:25:40 James Daugherty wrote:
> Michael: can you give a reasons to why you disagree?
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:00 PM Michael Yan wrote:
>
> > [-1]，specifically, I disagree with 1, 2, 10
>
Awesome, welcome back Loris!
On 2025/03/22 22:45:06 Paul King wrote:
> Lari is a big time past contributor to Grails (second biggest
> contributor to grails-core). He also has a wealth of knowledge about
> many relevant technologies and is involved in numerous Apache
> projects.
>
> Welcome (back
If merging repositories has so many benefits for releases, why not merge them
all together?
On 2025/04/02 17:35:28 James Daugherty wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As we discussed in last week's weekly meeting, we have a desire to merge
> grails-cache into grails-core. We want to continue to merge rep
James, that's great, I'm excited to see the topics related to Grails,
hopefully get more developers to pay attention to Groovy and Grails and talk
about them again.
On 2025/03/26 19:26:47 James Fredley wrote:
> I have submitted two session topics/papers to the Groovy Track:
>
> - Migrating a 20
18 matches
Mail list logo
