Hi Gianluca,
To me, grails-app is just a folder name like webapp, so I don't see the
benefit of changing the folder-name, except for a few letters shorter.
If others think the idea is good, I'm not opposed to it, I just don't see a
big win.
Den fre. 18. apr. 2025 kl. 11.01 skrev Gianluca Sartori
I have never thought much about the grails-app directory name and do not think
it should change since it does a good job describing the contents.
We should review our documentation around the directory structure, for a Grails
application, to ensure it clearly details the structure and purpose fo
All open issues and PRs from the Grails 7 GitHub project have been added to the
Apache Grails 7.0.x GitHub Project. Close/Done were not added.
All: https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/487/views/1
By Milestone:
https://github.com/orgs/apache/projects/487/views/2?sliceBy%5Bvalue%5D=grails%3A
I've been thinking about this forever...
We have the `grails-app` folder containing the conventions over
configuration project structure that is a Grails standard, a different one
from the `src` folder structure.
The fact it contains `grails` in its name can be useful to immediately
recognise the
I just want to thank you for the great work 👍
Gianluca Sartori
On Thu, 17 Apr 2025 at 14:48, James Fredley wrote:
> James,
>
> Thank you for the extremely detailed outline of the benefits and reasons
> for finishing the move to a mono repo for the Core Grails Projects, by
> consolidating the r
Hi Gianluca,
For me I try to use /assets to imply and assert files that participate in
the asset-pipeline and are compiled & handled in a particular way with its
own build system entirely separate from Angular
-Andrew
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 8:54 AM Gianluca Sartori
wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> out
Hi Everyone,
As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
for the "grails-core" libraries by merging the final 2 repositories
together: grails-geb & grails-data-mapping.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if all binding votes are
cast in favor.
[] +1 pr
+1 (binding)
James Fredley
On 2025/04/18 15:20:04 James Daugherty wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
> for the "grails-core" libraries by merging the final 2 repositories
> together: grails-geb & grails-data-mapping.
>
> The vote i
The initial response seems positive and given that this was originally
suggested in the other thread, I'm going to go ahead and start a vote
thread.
Thanks everyone!
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 4:00 AM Gianluca Sartori
wrote:
> I just want to thank you for the great work 👍
>
> Gianluca Sartori
>
>
Hi Everyone,
With the change to Apache Grails maven coordinates, we are moving
grails-wrapper to version 7.0.x to match the Grails version. ASF requires a
vote to change the default branch.
See: https://github.com/apache/grails-wrapper/pull/32
https://github.com/apache/grails-wrapper
The vot
Hi Gianluca,
We hold out angular files in src/main/client which I’d say also makes it
qualify as the “webapp”. For me the grails-app folder helps make clear the
separation of concerns; grails-app is my backend benefiting from all the
frameworks benefits and conventions, src is the Wild West of p
Hi Andrew,
out of curiosity, what's the reason why you are not using the
`/grails-app/assets` folder to store your client side JS code?
Gianluca Sartori
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 at 14:44, Andrew Garcia
wrote:
> Hi Gianluca,
> We hold out angular files in src/main/client which I’d say also makes it
I get what you’re going for and I appreciate you throwing the idea out there.
But I don’t think this is the right move.
The grails app folder isn’t just a label. It’s part of how the framework
functions. Grails, the build system, plugins, and pretty much every tool in the
ecosystem expect that
+1 (non-binding)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 11:22 AM James Daugherty
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
> for the "grails-core" libraries by merging the final 2 repositories
> together: grails-geb & grails-data-mapping.
>
> The vote is
Hi Everyone,
With the change to Apache Grails maven coordinates, we are moving profiles back
to version 7.0.x to match the Grails version. ASF requires a vote to change
the default branch. We were on Version 10.0.x due to the angular profile being
a higher version when the profile project was
+1
Gianluca Sartori
On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 at 17:20, James Daugherty
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
> for the "grails-core" libraries by merging the final 2 repositories
> together: grails-geb & grails-data-mapping.
>
> The vote
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 6:19 PM James Fredley
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> With the change to Apache Grails maven coordinates, we are moving
> grails-wrapper to version 7.0.x to match the Grails version. ASF requires a
> vote to change the default branch.
>
> See: https://github.com/ap
+1 (binding)
On Fri, Apr 18, 2025 at 5:34 PM James Fredley
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> With the change to Apache Grails maven coordinates, we are moving profiles
> back to version 7.0.x to match the Grails version. ASF requires a vote to
> change the default branch. We were on Version 10.0.x due
+1 (binding)
> On Apr 18, 2025, at 1:15 PM, Gianluca Sartori wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Gianluca Sartori
>
>
> On Fri, 18 Apr 2025 at 17:20, James Daugherty
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Everyone,
>>
>> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
>> for the "grails-core" libraries b
The grails-app directory is there to force a division between domain |
views | services | assets. It can contain non-source files, and thus it
wouldn't make sense to have it under src ever. We need a way to
distinguish this, and putting it under resource wouldn't make sense since
the files are of
+1 (binding)
On 2025/04/18 15:20:04 James Daugherty wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
> for the "grails-core" libraries by merging the final 2 repositories
> together: grails-geb & grails-data-mapping.
>
> The vote is open for the
+1 (binding)
James Fredley
On 2025/04/18 15:20:04 James Daugherty wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
> for the "grails-core" libraries by merging the final 2 repositories
> together: grails-geb & grails-data-mapping.
>
> The vote i
+1 (binding)
/ Mattias
Den fre 18 apr. 2025 17:25James Fredley skrev:
> +1 (binding)
>
> James Fredley
>
> On 2025/04/18 15:20:04 James Daugherty wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we form a mono repo
> > for the "grails-core" libraries by mergi
23 matches
Mail list logo
