+1
*Regards,*
*Justin Dodson*
*(913) 267 - 2671*
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 1:24 PM Mattias Reichel
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Den ons 9 apr. 2025 kl 19:44 skrev Ricardo Vargas :
>
> > +1
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 3:35 PM James Daugherty
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi Everyone,
> > >
> > > As per t
+1 (binding)
On 2025/04/09 14:35:08 James Daugherty wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we merge the
> grails-views & grails-gradle-plugin repos into the grails-core repo.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if all binding votes are
>
I really like the idea of the documentation living with the code and am
strongly in favor of this change.
James
On 2025/04/09 14:55:25 James Daugherty wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We have discussed moving the documentation to grails-core in the past, but
> have held off because the gh-pages bran
+1
Gianluca Sartori
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:57, James Daugherty
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> We have discussed moving the documentation to grails-core in the past, but
> have held off because the gh-pages branch is very large since it contains
> the history of documentation.
>
> I'd like to pro
+1
Gianluca Sartori
On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 17:16, James Fredley wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> On 2025/04/09 14:35:08 James Daugherty wrote:
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we merge the
> > grails-views & grails-gradle-plugin repos into the grails-core r
+1 (binding)
Den ons. 9. apr. 2025 kl. 16.35 skrev James Daugherty
:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we merge the
> grails-views & grails-gradle-plugin repos into the grails-core repo.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if all binding vot
I agree that it's a good idea to get the documentation close to the code.
Den ons. 9. apr. 2025 kl. 17.18 skrev Gianluca Sartori :
> +1
>
> Gianluca Sartori
>
>
>
> On Wed, 9 Apr 2025 at 16:57, James Daugherty
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > We have discussed moving the documentation to grai
To be clear, we would continue to publish the docs to grails-doc. We just
would have the docs live with the code.
> On Apr 9, 2025, at 11:28 AM, Søren Berg Glasius wrote:
>
> I agree that it's a good idea to get the documentation close to the code.
>
> Den ons. 9. apr. 2025 kl. 17.18 skrev Gi
+1 (binding)
Den ons 9 apr. 2025 kl 19:44 skrev Ricardo Vargas :
> +1
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 3:35 PM James Daugherty
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we merge the
> > grails-views & grails-gradle-plugin repos into the grails-core repo.
Hi Everyone,
As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we merge the
grails-views & grails-gradle-plugin repos into the grails-core repo.
The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if all binding votes are
cast in favor.
[] +1 proceed with the proposal
[] 0 I don't have a strong
0
I don’t feel strongly, but we don’t use/are moving away from gsp/view
capabilities of grails, leaning entirely on angular (back end just responds
with json). The gorm/groovy capabilities of grails are compelling enough for us
to use/love the framework. Ideally we wouldn’t bundle in the gsp e
+1
On Wed, Apr 9, 2025 at 3:35 PM James Daugherty
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread [1], I'd like to propose we merge the
> grails-views & grails-gradle-plugin repos into the grails-core repo.
>
> The vote is open for the next 72 hours and passes if all binding votes are
> ca
12 matches
Mail list logo
