Welcome. It will be exciting to see Grails 7 released as Apache Grails!
On 2025/03/22 22:45:06 Paul King wrote:
> Lari is a big time past contributor to Grails (second biggest
> contributor to grails-core). He also has a wealth of knowledge about
> many relevant technologies and is involved in nu
I withdraw my veto. My vote is 0.
On 2025/03/22 03:00:08 Michael Yan wrote:
> [-1]，specifically, I disagree with 1, 2, 10
>
> On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:02 AM James Daugherty
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to propose that we move forward
> > with the
Hi Everyone,
I realized I replied to the thread instead of starting a new one.
Resending here:
The vote has passed with FIVE +1 binding votes. There was one abstaining
binding vote and FOUR +1 non-binding votes.
We'll proceed this week with getting snapshot builds setup. The goal is to
have th
Hi Everyone,
The vote has passed with FIVE +1 binding votes. There was one abstaining
binding vote and FOUR +1 non-binding votes.
We'll proceed this week with getting snapshot builds setup. The goal is to
have them publishing before next week.
Regards,
James
On Mon, Mar 24, 2025 at 10:05 PM M
Thank you Lari!
It has been a long time. I am happy to see you engaged. :)
Jeff
Jeff Brown
Partner, Distinguished Engineer
mobile (314) 368-7771
objectcomputing.com
TECHNOLOGY THAT EMPOWERS™
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 5:46 PM Paul King wrote:
> Lari is a big time past contributor to Grails (
Yes, I am just talking about the repository name, not the groupId or
artifactId.
The repository name can be any name available in our Git namespace, it will
not conflict or influence any other repository name on any other GitHub
namespace.
Gianluca
On Thu, 20 Mar 2025 at 17:06, Søren Berg Glasius
as for grails-spring-security, I think it makes sense to keep it, because
there is also shiro security, and while it is not released under Apache, it
is still a thing.
Den tors. 20. mar. 2025 kl. 16.56 skrev Gianluca Sartori <
g.sart...@gmail.com>:
> About the repository names, are there reasons
Actually, how about this proposal:
Why don't we make anything that is a plugin have a root group id of
"org.apache.grails", and anything that's supportive have a nested group
name based on the type?
On Thu, Mar 20, 2025 at 8:42 AM James Daugherty
wrote:
> Here are the differences between James
