+1
Den lör 22 mars 2025 05:25James Daugherty
skrev:
> Michael: can you give a reasons to why you disagree?
>
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:00 PM Michael Yan wrote:
>
> > [-1],specifically, I disagree with 1, 2, 10
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 6:02 AM James Daugherty
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi E
Lari is a big time past contributor to Grails (second biggest
contributor to grails-core). He also has a wealth of knowledge about
many relevant technologies and is involved in numerous Apache
projects.
Welcome (back) Lari!
Cheers, Paul.
Fantastic news! Awesome to hear Lari!
*Regards,*
*Justin Dodson*
*(913) 267 - 2671*
On Sat, Mar 22, 2025 at 5:45 PM Paul King wrote:
> Lari is a big time past contributor to Grails (second biggest
> contributor to grails-core). He also has a wealth of knowledge about
> many relevant technolog
We are getting there!
A couple of more thoughts and suggestions on the last iteration (
https://github.com/jdaugherty/grails-core/blob/3b4da92e339b7b688011e4a8ffc3c2aaea723680/RENAME.md?plain=1
):
1. As we are working with groupings, I think we should consider collapsing
some group parts in the
+1
Gianluca Sartori
On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 23:01, James Daugherty
wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
> As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to propose that we move forward
> with the maven coordinate changes so we can begin snapshot builds under the
> ASF namespace.
>
> I've done my best to capture ev
+1 (binding)
Sent from my iPhone
> On Mar 22, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Søren Berg Glasius wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
>> Den lør. 22. mar. 2025 kl. 12.35 skrev Mattias Reichel <
>> mattias.reic...@gmail.com>:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Den lör 22 mars 2025 05:25James Daugherty
>> skrev:
>>
>>> Michael: can
+1
> On Mar 22, 2025, at 12:42, David Estes wrote:
>
> +1 (binding)
> Sent from my iPhone
>
>> On Mar 22, 2025, at 8:27 AM, Søren Berg Glasius wrote:
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>>
>>> Den lør. 22. mar. 2025 kl. 12.35 skrev Mattias Reichel <
>>> mattias.reic...@gmail.com>:
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>>
I'm sorry, I've missed this message! I'm fine with that.
Following up with James F. concerns about "grails-security-spring" VS
"grails-spring-security" though, I agree it is probably better to keep
"spring-security" to avoid confusion. In case of other security libraries
it could just be eg. "grai
+1 (binding)
Den lør. 22. mar. 2025 kl. 12.35 skrev Mattias Reichel <
mattias.reic...@gmail.com>:
> +1
>
> Den lör 22 mars 2025 05:25James Daugherty
> skrev:
>
> > Michael: can you give a reasons to why you disagree?
> >
> > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 11:00 PM Michael Yan
> wrote:
> >
> > > [-1],
I tend to lean towards the orange with the blue. I do like the green for
the legacy and spring related reasons but it doesn't jive well with the
blue, IMO.
*Regards,*
*Justin Dodson*
*(913) 267 - 2671*
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 11:57 AM James Fredley
wrote:
> Posting here on behalf of Martyn Du
+1
> Am 23.03.2025 um 00:57 schrieb Ricardo Vargas :
>
> +1
>
>> On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 at 19:47, Gianluca Sartori wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Gianluca Sartori
>>
>> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 23:01, James Daugherty
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Everyone,
>>>
>>> As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to pro
+1
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 at 19:47, Gianluca Sartori wrote:
> +1
>
> Gianluca Sartori
>
> On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 at 23:01, James Daugherty
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Everyone,
> >
> > As per the [DISCUSS] thread[1], I'd like to propose that we move forward
> > with the maven coordinate changes so we can begin
12 matches
Mail list logo