Re: [batchee] future?

I still use batchee very much. So I'd keep it well alive. Also investing time on and on. Is there anything which is required to do? LieGrue, strub > Am 18.11.2022 um 09:50 schrieb Francois Papon : > > Hi, > > I don't have insights about how BatchEE is used today and how the jbatch > specif

[CDI40] how to tackle the jakarta 10 APIs?

Hi! How do we want to approach the CDI-4.0 api? I don't want to just use the official API as it is bloated with the 'CDI light' stuff. So there is good reason to just keep our own version - even if it is just a shaded/spit of the official one. What about the others? Do we still want to roll our

Re: [batchee] future?

> No requirement, just making it living (updating versions and spec impl). >> >> Le mar. 22 nov. 2022 à 23:31, Mark Struberg via dev > <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>> a écrit : >>> I still use batchee very much. So I'd keep it well alive. Also investin

Re: [CDI40] how to tackle the jakarta 10 APIs?

/rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog > <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> > | LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> >

Re: [CDI40] how to tackle the jakarta 10 APIs?

nse'. But that seems to be EPLv2 as far as I've looked through a bunch of spec api jars. LieGrue, strub > Am 23.11.2022 um 11:02 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau : > > > > > Le mer. 23 nov. 2022 à 10:58, Mark Struberg via dev <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>> a é

Re: [batchee] future?

; (transaction manager, batchEE, etc). So they need a home. Of course we can >> split them apart and give them to different projects, but it does not solve >> any problem. The people are the same. As soon as we allow all projects to >> contribute or even become committers here, I

Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Arthur 1.0.6

+1 LieGrue, strub > Am 17.04.2023 um 20:54 schrieb fpapon : > > Hi, > > This is a call to vote in favor of releasing Apache Geronimo Arthur version > 1.0.6. > > We solved 7 issues: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10220&version=12351343 > > ** Bug >

[VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE-1.0.3

Hi! I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing BatchEE-1.0.3. This is mostly an update to the latest TomEE version and a fix in the ChildFirstURLClassLoader [BATCHEE-162 ] - improve reproducible builds [BATCHEE-167

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE-1.0.3

n.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book > <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance> > > Le mar. 18 avr. 2023 à 12:27, Mark Struberg via dev <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>> a écrit : >> Hi! >> >> I'd like

Re: [VOTE] [RESULT] Release Apache Geronimo BatchEE-1.0.3

Hi! And here comes my own +1 That makes it: +1: Romain, Francois, Jean-Louis, Mark No -1 nor 0 I'll go on to publish the repo etc. LieGrue, strub > Am 18.04.2023 um 12:26 schrieb Mark Struberg : > > Hi! > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing BatchEE-1.0.3. > > This is mostly an update

Status BatchEE-2.0.0

Hi folks! I've now finished the work on BatchEE-2.0.0. I think we have to enable the TCK still, but all our internal tests do work again. Note that I had to move back to an old Camel version due to getting test errors with a newer version. Would be great if someone could please take a look at i

Re: Arthur release

all fine, go on! txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 05.04.2024 um 09:30 schrieb Francois Papon : > > Hi all, > > I would like to start the release process for Arthur, any objection? > > regards, > > François >

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.25 release

+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 15.04.2024 um 13:34 schrieb fpapon : > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache XBean 4.25 release to your vote. > > This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on > the release note): > > * Bug > - [XBEAN-343] - consistent handling of NoCl

Re: [VOTE] Apache Geronimo Mail 2.1 spec 1.0.0

+1 LueGrue, strub > Am 10.06.2024 um 16:03 schrieb Jean-Louis MONTEIRO : > > Hi everyone, > > I fixed 2 bugs and realized we were still in milestone mode. So it's more > than overdue. Here is a vote for the final 1.0.0 of the Jakarta Mail spec 2.1 > > SVN Tag > https://svn.apache.org/viewvc/g

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.26

+1 (binding) txs and LieGrue,strub On Friday, 11 October 2024 at 10:14:07 CEST, Francois Papon wrote: Hi everyone, I submit Apache XBean 4.26 release to your vote. This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on the release note): * Improvement - [XBEAN-

Re: [DISCUSS] XBean release

+1 LieGrue,strub On Wednesday, 9 October 2024 at 15:17:58 CEST, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: +1 Le mer. 9 oct. 2024 à 15:05, Francois Papon a écrit : Hi all, I would like to start the release process for the next XBean releasing including the new ASM version. Any objections? re

Re: [VOTE] Apache XBean 4.27

+1 txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 07.04.2025 um 21:37 schrieb Francois Papon : > > Hi everyone, > > I submit Apache XBean 4.27 release to your vote. > > This release mainly includes (other issue description is available on the > release note): > > * Improvement > - [XBEAN-348] - Upgrade to

[DISCUSS] bulk closing all open tickets created before 2015?

hi! I'd like to clean up Jira and close all tickets opened before 2015. Those mostly relate to the old geronimo app server project = GERONIMO AND resolution = Unresolved AND created < 2015-01-01 AND component != 'transaction manager' ORDER BY key DESC, priority DESC, updated DESC ok? txs an

Re: [DISCUSS] bulk closing all open tickets created before 2015?

810 issues closed. txs and LieGrue, strub > Am 08.04.2025 um 16:32 schrieb Francois Papon : > > Hi, > > big +1! > > regards, > > François > fpa...@apache.org > francois.pa...@openobject.fr > > Le 08/04/2025 à 11:41, Mark Struberg via dev a écrit :