[ANNOUNCE] Apache Geode 1.8.0

2018-12-12 Thread Alexander Murmann
The Apache Geode community is pleased to announce the availability of Apache Geode 1.8.0. Apache Geode is a data management platform that provides a database-like consistency model, reliable transaction processing and a shared-nothing architecture to maintain very low latency performance with high

Re: Default branch for geode-examples

2018-12-12 Thread Michael Stolz
Consistency is best in my opinion. -- Mike Stolz Principal Engineer - Gemfire Product Manager Mobile: 631-835-4771 On Dec 12, 2018 9:59 AM, "Jacob Barrett" wrote: > Make the default “develop” to be consistent with the rest of our > repositories. Put a statement in the https://urldefense.proofpo

Re: Default branch for geode-examples

2018-12-12 Thread Jacob Barrett
Make the default “develop” to be consistent with the rest of our repositories. Put a statement in the README.md that these examples for the 1.9.0-SNAPSHOT (develop). When cutting a release and merging to master change the say they are for 1.9.0 (rel/v1.9.0). > On Dec 12, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Anth

Re: Default branch for geode-examples

2018-12-12 Thread Alexander Murmann
I agree that there is a conflict here of what might be most usable for users vs. developers contributing to the geode-examples repo. No matter which route we go down, we should improve guidance. If we keep master the default, I +1 Owen's suggestion of amending the template. If we make develop the

Re: Default branch for geode-examples

2018-12-12 Thread Owen Nichols
I believe master is still the best default branch for most users. Can we add a PR template for geode-examples reminding developers that examples PRs must be based on develop, not master? Generally the only difference between examples' develop and master is which maven repo it points to (snapsh

Re: Default branch for geode-examples

2018-12-12 Thread Anthony Baker
I’m fine with moving all development work to master given the use case for geode-examples—I just don’t want PR’s merged to *both* master and develop. Other thoughts? Anthony > On Dec 12, 2018, at 9:16 AM, Dan Smith wrote: > > Good question! I think we intentionally left the default branch a

Re: Default branch for geode-examples

2018-12-12 Thread Dan Smith
Good question! I think we intentionally left the default branch as master so that users cloning the examples from github will get examples that work against a released version of geode. That said, I don't feel too strongly if we would rather make things more consistent with the geode repo - it se

Re: Cluster Manage Service Proposal wiki edit access

2018-12-12 Thread Dan Smith
Hi Peter, You should have access now. Thanks! -Dan On Wed, Dec 12, 2018 at 7:04 AM Peter Tran wrote: > Thanks Dan! > > It's ptran > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:16 PM Dan Smith wrote: > > > Hi Peter, > > > > Sure, what's your user name on the apache wiki? > > > > -Dan > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2

Default branch for geode-examples

2018-12-12 Thread Anthony Baker
Alexander noticed that some recent PR’s against the geode-examples repo made against the master branch. That breaks the gitflow approach where only released code is on master. Should we update the default branch to be develop? Anthony

Re: Cluster Manage Service Proposal wiki edit access

2018-12-12 Thread Peter Tran
Thanks Dan! It's ptran On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 4:16 PM Dan Smith wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Sure, what's your user name on the apache wiki? > > -Dan > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:08 PM Peter Tran wrote: > > > Hi Geode Devs, > > > > I was having a look at > > > > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com