Perhaps we should provide the Backward compatible version in the initial 2.0
release, and provided a deprecation plan for simplifying the code and only
supporting the newer Kryo 5.x in Flink 2.1+. This would be inline with the
previous decision provided in the FLIP's compatibility and deprecatio
Thanks Martijn.
That's really great context. In that case, then I'll change my previous
opinion. I agree that we should proceed with the simpler pull request and get
it into the Flink 2.0 release.
On 2025/02/25 14:06:20 Martijn Visser wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> For the record, I don't think we have
