Re: Kubernetes Operator 1.5.0 release planning

Hi Gyula, Glad to help too - I wanted to try a security scan and get an idea of current possible vulnerability issues in main prior to the RC, so tried building the operator, and I'm getting an error. I've created issue 31982 Maybe this only

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.5.0, release candidate #1

Hi Gyula, Thanks for the RC-1. I'm taking a look at the rc-1, and I'm having a problem deploying on OpenShift 4.10 and 4.12 for some reason. I first tried the helm install method in the default namespace, and the operator launches fine. But when I try one of the example flinkdeployments it's

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.5.0, release candidate #2

Hi Guyla, I was able to deploy rc-2 with helm on a kind cluster and it was able to deploy the sample. But I'm still struggling on OpenShift with rc-2. There's some kind of RBAC permission issue that I haven't been able to solve when it deploys the flinkdep or flinksessionjobs. oc get flinkd

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.5.0, release candidate #2

Hi Gyula, Well, I don't understand this RBAC very well, but I got it to work with a simple one-line change, adding the line "- flinkdeployments/finalizers" to the flink.apache.org apiGroups section of the clusterrole like this: oc edit clusterrole flink-operator - apiGroups: - flink.apac

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.5.0, release candidate #2

+1 (Non-binding) I tested the following: - helm repo install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.5.0-helm.tgz (See note 1 below) - podman Dockerfile build from source, looked good. (See note 2 below) - twistlock vulnerability scans of proposed ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:be07be7 looks

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.3.0, release candidate #1

Thanks for the rc-1 Matyas , +1 (non-binding) * Helm repo install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.3.0-helm.tgz * podman Dockerfile build from source looks good * twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good: ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf * UI and

Edit Wiki for Release Verification Steps

I'd like to be able to edit the wiki page: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Verifying+a+Flink+Kubernetes+Operator+Release It says it's unrestricted, but maybe I need to be added to the Flink space first? jbus...@us.ibm.com Thanks! Jim

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.3.1, release candidate #1

Thanks Gyula for the release. +1 (non-binding) I tested the following: * Helm repo install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.3.1-helm.tgz * podman Dockerfile build from source looks good *twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good, no currently known vulnerabilities w

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.4.0, release candidate #1

Hi Gyula, I’m noticing that the link for “All artifacts for c) can be found at the Apache Nexus Repository [2]” Might be https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1583/ And not https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheflink-1582/ Thanks, Jim

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.4.0, release candidate #1

Thanks Gyula for the release. +1 (non-binding) I tested the following: * Helm repo install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.4.0-helm.tgz * Podman Dockerfile build from source, looked good. * Twistlock security scans of proposed image looks good. No currently known vulnerabilities

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.0.0, release candidate #1

Hi Yang, Thank you for the RC1. I couldn’t build from source due to the .git copy issue, but cloning and building from the release-1.0 branch looked good. * Twistlock vulnerability scan was clean of all known issues * Helm install with this release-1.0 source image ran fine on OpenShift

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.0.0, release candidate #2

Hi Yang, I still see the git issue when trying to build from source: [1/2] STEP 16/19: COPY *.git ./.git Error: error building at STEP "COPY *.git ./.git": checking on sources under "/root/FLINK/release-1.0-rc2/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.0.0": Rel: can't make relative to /root/FLINK/release

RE: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.0.0, release candidate #2

Hi Yang, Oh, I’ve been using podman on Red Hat for testing: podman version Client: Podman Engine Version: 4.0.2 API Version: 4.0.2 If I use Docker (version 20.10.13 for me right now) then it builds fine with that COPY git line. Nice! To use podman, I need to either comment

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.0.0, release candidate #3

Hi Yang, Thank you for RC3 +1 (not-binding) * Podman builds look great with your .dockerignore file and “COPY . .” Thank you for the fix. * Twistlock security scans look clean of both your “ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:52b50c2 image” as well as a locally built image from

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.0.0, release candidate #4

Hi Yang, +1 (not-binding) * Helm install looks good, logs look normal * Podman build from source looks good * Security scans of a built image and your ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:fa2cd14 container look great. * UI and basic sample look good. Thank you, Jim

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.1.0, release candidate #1

Thanks for the release I’m continuing to test and so far it’s looking good, but I found a high security vulnerability in the /flink-kubernetes-operator/flink-kubernetes-operator-1.1.0-shaded.jar file. I’ve created issue FLINK-28637 and seeing

RE: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.1.0, release candidate #1

Thank you Gyula, +1 (non-binding) Successfully verified the following: * Helm install of RC1 on OpenShift 4.8.43 and 4.10.18 * Checksums, GPG signatures look good * Deployed some examples, looks good, nothing strange in logs. * Port-forward of the rest UI looked good * Rebuil

Re: [VOTE] Apache Flink Kubernetes Operator Release 1.2.0, release candidate #2

+1 (not-binding) Thank you Gyula, Helm install from flink-kubernetes-operator-1.2.0-helm.tgz looks good, logs look normal podman Dockerfile build from source looks good. twistlock security scans of the proposed image look good: ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf UI and basic

Re: [ANNOUNCE] New Apache Flink Committer - Matyas Orhidi

Congratulations Matyas! Jim -- James Busche | Sr. Software Engineer, Watson AI and Data Open Technology | 408-460-0737 | jbus...@us.ibm.com From: Márton Balassi Date: Monday, November 21, 2022 at 6:18 AM To: Flink Dev , morh...@apache.org Subject: [EXTERNAL] [ANNO

Re: [DISCUSS] OLM Bundles for Flink Kubernetes Operator

I'm curious how the RC automation works now - is it fully automatic? For example, a RC Debian image gets created, something like: ghcr.io/apache/flink-kubernetes-operator:95128bf and is pushed to ghcr.io … then that's used in the rc helm c