Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Flip-532 Donate GetInData HTTP Connector to Flink

Hey Sergey, I thought about this question as well, but in my opinion, a regular 3 binding PMC vote is sufficient here: The description of a new codebase adoption is: > Adoption of large existing external codebase. This refers to contributions > big enough that potentially change the shape and di

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

+1 (non-binding) I will also help validate the release Thank you, Mate On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 5:52 AM Kumar Mallikarjuna wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks, Gyula! > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 9:11 AM, Yuepeng Pan wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding). > > Thanks for driving it. > > > > Best, > > Yuep

Flink CDC Pipeline connector support for Postgres

Hi team, We have a requirement for Postgres CDC to Iceberg with the table schema inference at runtime. Looks like Flink CDC Pipeline connector for Postgres can help with this. I wanted to know if there is any plan to support the Flink CDC Pipeline connector for Postgres in the next release (3.5.0

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

+1 (non-binding) On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 8:09 AM Mate Czagany wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > I will also help validate the release > > Thank you, > Mate > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 5:52 AM Kumar Mallikarjuna > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks, Gyula! > > > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 9:11

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX Improving PyFlink - The Zen of Flink

Hi Zander, Thanks for the reply. It's clear for me now. > Regarding follow on FLIPs, there are not currently any, but this seems > logical. We could make FLIPs for some of the items that should be discussed > separately and those that don't could be made into issues and tracked that > way? I am o

[RESULT][VOTE] Release 1.20.2, release candidate #2

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 4 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: - Mate Czagany (non-binding) - Márton Balassi (binding) - Sergey Nuyanzin (binding) - Robert Metzger (binding) There are no disapproving votes. Thanks everyone!

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.2, release candidate #2

Thank you all, we have collected enough valid votes. I will announce the voting results in a separate thread. Best, Ferenc On Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 at 14:12, Robert Metzger wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > - checked the sources for binaries > - downloaded the binaries, ran an example, c

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.19.3, release candidate #2

Thank you all, we have collected enough valid votes. I will announce the voting results in a separate thread. Best, Ferenc On Wednesday, July 2nd, 2025 at 10:22, Zakelly Lan wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > - Verified checksums and signatures > - Reviewed jira release notes > - Checked the

[RESULT][VOTE] Release 1.19.3, release candidate #2

I'm happy to announce that we have unanimously approved this release. There are 5 approving votes, 3 of which are binding: - Mate Czagany (non-binding) - Márton Balassi (binding) - Weiqing Yang (non-binding) - Sergey Nuyanzin (binding) - Zakelly Lan (binding) There are no disapproving votes. Th

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks Gyula! Ryan van Huuksloot Staff Engineer, Infrastructure | Streaming Platform [image: Shopify] On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 11:38 AM Tom Cooper wrote: > These sound like serious issues, so +1 (non-bind

[DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

Hi All! We released the Kubernetes operator 1.12.0 version about a month ago. Since then 2 critical issues were identified that I feel should be addressed in a patch release, namely: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37895 https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38033 The fixes are

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

These sound like serious issues, so +1 (non-binding) from me on a .1 release. Thanks for running this Gyula. Tom Cooper @tomcooper.dev | https://tomcooper.dev On Wednesday, 2 July 2025 at 16:34, Gyula Fóra wrote: > Hi All! > > We released the Kubernetes operator 1.12.0 version about a month

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

+1, going to validate the release. G On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 5:49 PM Ryan van Huuksloot wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > Thanks Gyula! > > Ryan van Huuksloot > Staff Engineer, Infrastructure | Streaming Platform > [image: Shopify] >

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.19.3, release candidate #2

+1 (binding) - Verified checksums and signatures - Reviewed jira release notes - Checked the git tag - Checked web PR - Confirmed several artifacts are built with maven 3.8.6 and JDK 1.8.0_442 Best, Zakelly On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 3:43 PM Sergey Nuyanzin wrote: > +1 (binding) > > - verified c

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-38041) Schema.Builder#fromResolvedSchema dropps comments

Arvid Heise created FLINK-38041: --- Summary: Schema.Builder#fromResolvedSchema dropps comments Key: FLINK-38041 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38041 Project: Flink Issue Type: B

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX: Flink Events Reporter System

Hi Flink Devs, Following up on this thread from May. Thank you again, Li Wang, for the helpful initial discussion. I have now completed a full revision of the Events Reporter System proposal. From my side, the FLIP is complete and ready for a full community review. The document is here: https://

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-521: Integrating Variant Type into Flink: Enabling Efficient Semi-Structured Data Processing

Hi Alexey, Thanks for the reminder! The FLIP is updated. Best, Xuannan > On Jul 2, 2025, at 08:02, Alexey Leonov-Vendrovskiy > wrote: > > Hi Xuannan, > Can you link the voting thread and add a JIRA link to the FLIP doc? > > Thanks, > Alexey > > On Wed, May 7, 2025 at 12:28 AM Xuannan Su w

Re: [VOTE] Release 1.20.2, release candidate #2

+1 (binding) - checked the sources for binaries - downloaded the binaries, ran an example, checked the UI, checked the CLI for listing/cancelling jobs - staged maven artifacts look good - checked the release announcement On Sun, Jun 29, 2025 at 10:32 AM Sergey Nuyanzin wrote: > +1 (binding) >

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

+1 (non-binding). Thanks Gyula! Best, Weiqing On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:32 AM Gabor Somogyi wrote: > +1, going to validate the release. > > G > > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 5:49 PM Ryan van Huuksloot > wrote: > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > Thanks Gyula! > > > > Ryan van Huuksloot > > Staff Engi

Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-XXX: Flink Events Reporter System

Hi Kartikey, +1 Thanks for the FLIP. This is going to improve a key part of observability for flink which would open further avenues as mentioned in the FLIP. Regards, Nishita Pattanayak On Wed, 2 Jul 2025 at 1:32 PM, Kartikey Pant wrote: > Hi Flink Devs, > > Following up on this thread from Ma

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

+1 (non-binding). Thanks for driving it. Best, Yuepeng Pan At 2025-07-03 11:25:20, "Weiqing Yang" wrote: >+1 (non-binding). Thanks Gyula! > > >Best, >Weiqing > >On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 10:32 AM Gabor Somogyi >wrote: > >> +1, going to validate the release. >> >> G >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 2,

Re: [DISCUSS] Kubernetes Operator 1.12.1 patch release

+1 (non-binding) Thanks, Gyula! On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 at 9:11 AM, Yuepeng Pan wrote: > +1 (non-binding). > Thanks for driving it. > > Best, > Yuepeng Pan > > > > > > > > > > At 2025-07-03 11:25:20, "Weiqing Yang" wrote: > >+1 (non-binding). Thanks Gyula! > > > > > >Best, > >Weiqing > > > >On Wed,

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-38040) Documentation for VARIANT type and PARSE_JSON

Xuannan Su created FLINK-38040: -- Summary: Documentation for VARIANT type and PARSE_JSON Key: FLINK-38040 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38040 Project: Flink Issue Type: Sub-tas