Hi Dev,
I hope this email finds you well.
I am using Flink 1.20.1 with this environment:
> java 11.0.26 2025-01-21 LTS
> Java(TM) SE Runtime Environment 18.9 (build 11.0.26+7-LTS-187)
> Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM 18.9 (build 11.0.26+7-LTS-187, mixed
> mode)
> OS: Windows 11
> IDE: VSCode
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-523: Handle TLS Certificate Renewal [1],
which has been discussed in this thread [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
Regards,
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-523%3A+Handle+TLS+Certificate+Renewal
[2]
https://
+1 (binding)
Gyula
On Fri, Jun 27, 2025 at 11:04 AM David Radley
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> We have 2 binding votes and 13 non-binding votes. Lots of votes - we are
> so close – we need one more committer to give a binding vote to get this
> through. Can anyone help here please?
> Kind re
Hi devs,
The vote[1] on FLIP-532[2] concluded with the following results:
Approving(+1) votes:
Ferenc Csaky (binding)
Gyula Fora (binding)
Leonard Xu (binding)
PoorVank Bhatia (non-binding)
Sharath (non-binding)
Nic Townsend (non-binding)
Lajith Koova (non-binding)
Tom Cooper (non-binding)
Thanks Dian Fu,
On 1) This is more in reference to how if we modify things like the builder
pattern, we could end up changing certain configuration patterns. I will
reframe this to say - Currently there are no expected interfaces that will
be removed, but as the work evolves there may be some requ
Hi Zander,
Thanks for the reply. Makes sense to me!
Some follow-up questions:
1) Are there follow-up sub-FLIP discussions? I'm asking this because
this doc seems more like an umbrella which shapes the whole picture on
what we want to do. For example, it includes things we could just do
without vo
One more question, what's the motivation and what do you want to do in
the part `replace beam local execution`? Not sure if you want to
improve the debugging experience. It supports loopback mode [1] in
PyFlink which allows debugging the Python UDF in the IDE without any
setup (just setting breakpo
Hi, Zander
Thank you for bringing this topic up.
Could you give more input about the following improvement? Do you have some
specific scenario that needs this improvement?
Replace beam local execution
Evaluate alternatives for the local execution engine.
Best,
Guowei
On Sat, Jun 28, 2025 at
+1 (binding)
G
On Mon, Jun 30, 2025 at 9:59 AM Nicolas Fraison
wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-523: Handle TLS Certificate Renewal [1],
> which has been discussed in this thread [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Regards,
>
> [1]
>
> https://cw
Salva created FLINK-38033:
-
Summary: Job upgrades fail for operator v1.12
Key: FLINK-38033
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38033
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Components:
Shuai Xu created FLINK-38032:
Summary: Release Testing: Verify FLIP-519: Introduce async lookup
key ordered mode
Key: FLINK-38032
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-38032
Project: Flink
Thank you for your volunteering here David
I don't want to be a devil's advocate however I'm not sure we can
consider it as a regular FLIP and accepted.
The reason I think this way is the current Flink Bylaws[1] and
especially telling that in case of "Adoption of New Codebase"
we need to achieve 2
12 matches
Mail list logo
