Hi Nicolas,
Related SSLContext I've not gone through all the cases where we need to
reload so instead I'm sharing the concept.
The main intention is that we must control all execution paths which decide
which certificate used for authentication.
Creating an SSLContext decorator which checks reload
I created https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37818 and provided a
fix. I will Look for a reviewer to get it in asap.
Best
Arvid
On Tue, May 20, 2025, 10:46 Teunissen, F.G.J. (Fred)
wrote:
> Hi Arvid,
>
> Our application picks up a bunch of DDL/DML SQL statements defined by
> end-users
Hey Xuyang,
Thanks for proposing this and driving the discussion. In general, a very
interesting idea.
- Can you go a bit in detail on how the optimizer will work in AUTO/FORCE
modes? When are we returning an error or falling back to the regular
streaming join operator? Do we support, for example
I cherry-picked your commits on top of the main branch and build a local
version. I can confirm that this issue is solved with this fix.
From: Arvid Heise
Date: Tuesday, 20 May 2025 at 11:17
To: Teunissen, F.G.J. (Fred)
Cc: dev@flink.apache.org
Subject: Re: Issue with Duplicate transactionalI
Hi Roman,
This is a great and important improvement. +1 for the FLIP and to start
voting.
Best,
Gustavo
On Mon, 19 May 2025 at 20:28, Roman Khachatryan wrote:
> Thanks everyone for the discussion!
>
> I'm going to start a voting thread soon unless there are other suggestions
> or objections.
>
Hi,
Would it be possible to have the Fix Version/s of the Jira issue FLINK-37222
[1] updated to reflect the fix has been backported to into release-1.20?
This issue is closed as fixed in version 2.1.0 only, so it is not reflected in
changes expected. In the next maintenance release 1.20.2 [2]
Ferenc Csaky created FLINK-37820:
Summary: AsyncScalarFunction UDFs cannot be loaded via CompiledPlan
Key: FLINK-37820
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37820
Project: Flink
Is
+1 (binding)
Best,
Junrui
Hao Li 于2025年5月21日周三 03:42写道：
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Hao
>
> On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:39 PM Piotr Nowojski
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best, Piotrek
> >
> > wt., 20 maj 2025 o 20:29 Roman Khachatryan
> napisał(a):
> >
> > > Hi everyone
Thanks everyone for sharing thoughts.
Sorry for the late reply.
I'm also +1 for the limited white list from the start.
Also Thanks Rui for sharing extra information.
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 8:59 PM Gustavo de Morais
wrote:
> Hi Roman,
>
> This is a great and important improvement. +1 for the FLI
+1 (binding)
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 10:25 AM Junrui Lee wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Junrui
>
> Hao Li 于2025年5月21日周三 03:42写道：
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Hao
> >
> > On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:39 PM Piotr Nowojski
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > +1 (binding)
> > >
> >
+1 (non-binding)
——
Best regards,
Feifan Wang
Replied Message
| From | Hao Li |
| Date | 05/21/2025 03:42 |
| To | |
| Subject | Re: [VOTE] FLIP-530: Dynamic job configuration |
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Hao
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:39 PM Piotr Nowojski
wrote:
H
Hi devs,
Sean, Chris and I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-531 [1], about
introducing a new sub-project, Flink Agents.
With the rise of agentic AI, we have identified great new opportunities for
Flink, particularly in the system-triggered agent scenarios. We believe the
future of AI agen
dalongliu created FLINK-37822:
-
Summary: OpenTelemetryMetricReporterITCase.testReport test failed
of azure ci
Key: FLINK-37822
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37822
Project: Flink
Thanks Xintong, Sean, and Chris for starting this discussion.
+1 to initial Flink Agents sub project.
Look forward to its first release!
Best,
Jingsong
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 11:21 AM Xintong Song wrote:
>
> Hi devs,
>
> Sean, Chris and I would like to start a discussion on FLIP-531 [1], abou
Arvid Heise created FLINK-37818:
---
Summary: Kafka connector requires unqiue TransactionalIdPrefix
even for non-EOS settings.
Key: FLINK-37818
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37818
Projec
+1 (binding)
Best,
Lincoln Lee
曹振 <15533273...@163.com> 于2025年5月20日周二 14:55写道：
> +1(non-binding)
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Best,
> CaoZhen
> Replied Message
> | From | weijie guo |
> | Date | 5/20/2025 13:42 |
> | To | |
> | Subject | Re: [VOTE] FLIP-486: Introduce a new DeltaJoin |
> +1(bindin
Hi Arvid,
Our application picks up a bunch of DDL/DML SQL statements defined by end-users
and uses the Table-Api to create a Flink Job. So setting unique prefixes per
sink is a bit tricky or we should tell all end-users to create unique output
table DDL statements (I would rather avoid that).
Hello, I can see that 7 months ago an important fix was merged into master:
https://github.com/apache/flink-connector-pulsar/pull/95
But there is no new connector version deployed in maven,
Why is the project stopped and when can we include this fix in a new connector
version release? The last v
Hi,
Overall your proposal looks great.
The event handling must indeed be super fast and we must also not change
original code path if reload not needed
I have some concerns around the ReloadableSSLContext implementing all
SSLContext
Do you really mean SSLContext (java SSLContext one) or do you re
Hi Gabor,
Thanks for the feedback.
The overall proposal with atomic dirty flag being set by the callback will
indeed work with any kind of implementation.
Will see to update the FLIP in a week or 2 if there are no other comments
on it
Nicolas
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 11:08 AM Gabor Somogyi
wr
Hi Fred,
ah yes, I think I understand the issue. The KafkaSink always creates a
KafkaCommitter even if you are not using EXACTLY_ONCE. It's an unfortunate
limitation of our Sink design.
When I implemented the change, I was assuming that you are running EOS if
there is a committer (because else its
Hi,
+1 (binding)
Best, Piotrek
wt., 20 maj 2025 o 20:29 Roman Khachatryan napisał(a):
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-530: Dynamic job configuration
> [1] which has been discussed in this thread [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objecti
+1 (non-binding)
Thanks,
Hao
On Tue, May 20, 2025 at 12:39 PM Piotr Nowojski
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best, Piotrek
>
> wt., 20 maj 2025 o 20:29 Roman Khachatryan napisał(a):
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-530: Dynamic job configuration
> > [1] which has b
Hao Li created FLINK-37819:
--
Summary: Add column expansion test for model TVF
Key: FLINK-37819
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37819
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Sub-task
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-530: Dynamic job configuration
[1] which has been discussed in this thread [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours unless there is an objection
or not enough votes.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/x/uglKFQ
[2]
https://lists.apache.o
dalongliu created FLINK-37821:
-
Summary:
JobMasterTriggerSavepointITCase.testDoNotCancelJobIfSavepointFails test failed
of azure ci
Key: FLINK-37821
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-37821
Hi, devs,
This is the third meeting for Flink 2.1 release cycle. I'd like to share
the information synced in the meeting.
- Feature Freeze
It is worth noting that there are only 4 weeks left until the
feature freeze time(June 21, 2025), and developers need to pay attention to
the feature free
+1 (binding)
Best,
Rui
On Wed, May 21, 2025 at 5:03 AM Feifan Wang wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
>
>
> ——
>
> Best regards,
>
> Feifan Wang
>
>
>
> Replied Message
> | From | Hao Li |
> | Date | 05/21/2025 03:42 |
> | To | |
> | Subject | Re: [VOTE] FLIP-530: Dynamic job
28 matches
Mail list logo
