[DISCUSS] - Ongoing development of Flink Statefun

Hi all, I wanted to ask around and see if anyone has opinions on ongoing development of Flink Statefun. I had a look at upgrading it to Flink 1.19 which seems doable but also noticed that there is at

Re:Re: Re: Re: FLIP-510: Drop ChangelogNormalize for operations which don't need it

I have no other questions. +1 for it. -- Best！ Xuyang At 2025-03-07 19:37:09, "Dawid Wysakowicz" wrote: >> >> From my understanding, for a sink, if its schema includes a primary key, >> we can assume it has >> the ability to process delete messages (with '-D') and perform deletio

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-506: Support Reuse Multiple Table Sinks in Planner

Hi devs, All comments in the discussion thread[1] have been resolved. I would like to proceed this voting process. [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/r1wo9sf3d1725fhwzrttvv56k4rc782m Regards, Xiangyu Feng Leonard Xu 于2025年3月10日周一 12:01写道： > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Leonard > > > 2025年2月25日 1

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-506: Support Reuse Multiple Table Sinks in Planner

+1 (binding) Best, Lincoln Lee xiangyu feng 于2025年3月10日周一 13:33写道： > Hi devs, > > All comments in the discussion thread[1] have been resolved. I would like > to proceed this voting process. > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/r1wo9sf3d1725fhwzrttvv56k4rc782m > > Regards, > Xiangyu Feng >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-506: Support Reuse Multiple Table Sinks in Planner

+1 (binding) Best, Leonard > 2025年2月25日 10:12，weijie guo 写道： > > +1(binding) > > Best regards, > > Weijie > > > Zhanghao Chen 于2025年2月23日周日 16:36写道： > >> +1 (non-binding) >> >> Thanks for driving this. It's a nice useability improvement for performing >> partial-updates on datalakes. >>