Hi all,
Thanks for all your input. If there's no other opinions in the next
couple of days, then I'll update the documentation accordingly.
Best regards,
Martijn
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 4:51 AM Benchao Li wrote:
>
> +1 for option 1. Thanks Martijn for taking care of this, I've also
> filed a i
Jing Ge created FLINK-34446:
---
Summary: regression: alias is not in lateral join
Key: FLINK-34446
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34446
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Re
Thanks for driving thie Emre,
+1 (binding)
Thanks,
Danny.
On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:42 PM Hong Liang wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thank you for driving this Emre! This is a good step towards better user
> experience when diagnosing performance issues with Flink jobs.
>
> Best,
> Hong
>
> On Wed,
Matthias Pohl created FLINK-34447:
-
Summary:
ActiveResourceManagerTest#testWorkerRegistrationTimeoutNotCountingAllocationTime
still fails on slow machines
Key: FLINK-34447
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brow
+1(binding)
Thanks for driving this proposal!
Best,
Rui
On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 17:47, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Thanks for driving thie Emre,
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Thanks,
> Danny.
>
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 9:42 PM Hong Liang wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Thank you for driving this Emre! Th
+1(non-binding)
Best,
Yuepeng.
At 2024-02-15 19:13:21, "Rui Fan" <1996fan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1(binding)
>
>Thanks for driving this proposal!
>
>Best,
>Rui
>
>On Thu, 15 Feb 2024 at 17:47, Danny Cranmer wrote:
>
>> Thanks for driving thie Emre,
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Danny.
>>
>
Hi,
Considering that the code and artifact have note changed since last vote
(only source release and tag have changed) and considering that there
were already 3 binding votes for this RC1, I'll do this on a lazy
consensus. I'll release if no one objects until tomorrow as it will be
72h since
Hi Etienne,
> I fixed the source release [1] as requested, it no more contains
> tools/release/shared directory.
I don't think that is the correct way: my understanding is that this
invalidates basically all the votes, because now the checked artifact
has changed. It was requested to file a tick
Martijn is correct in that if the source release got changed we need to
vet everything again.
If anything else had been changed instead there'd be a bit of leeway but
the source release itself is the most important bit of a release and we
just can't allow changes to that after the fact and still
Thanks all, this vote is now closed. I will announce the results on a separate
thread.
On 2024/01/29 10:09:10 "Kartoglu, Emre" wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'd like to call votes on FLIP-418: Show data skew score on Flink Dashboard.
>
> FLIP:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-418%3
I am happy to announce that “FLIP-418: Show data skew score on Flink Dashboard”
has been accepted with Consensus.
FLIP:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/FLIP-418%3A+Show+data+skew+score+on+Flink+Dashboard
Votes:
* Aleksandr Pilipenko +1 (non-binding)
* Danny Cranmer +
Hi Alexander,
Thanks so much for the info!
It sounds like the best path forward is for us to develop outside of Apache
while, in parallel, working to gain committer status. Our goal will be to
eventually move anything we build under the Apache umbrella once we're more
plugged in to the community.
Matthias Pohl created FLINK-34448:
-
Summary: ChangelogLocalRecoveryITCase failed fatally with 127 exit
code
Key: FLINK-34448
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-34448
Project: Flink
13 matches
Mail list logo
