Dawid Wysakowicz created FLINK-23417:
Summary: MiniClusterITCase.testHandleBatchJobsWhenNotEnoughSlot
fails on Azure
Key: FLINK-23417
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23417
Project
Dawid Wysakowicz created FLINK-23418:
Summary: 'Run kubernetes application HA test' fail on Azure
Key: FLINK-23418
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23418
Project: Flink
Is
Dawid Wysakowicz created FLINK-23419:
Summary:
CheckpointBarrierTrackerTest.testNextFirstCheckpointBarrierOvertakesCancellationBarrier
fails on Azure
Key: FLINK-23419
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/brows
I think we're all really close to the same solution.
I second Yun's thoughts that MAX_WATERMARK works well for time based
buffering, but it does not solve flushing other operations such as e.g.
count windows or batching requests in Sinks. I'd prefer to treat the
finish() as a message for Operator
+1(binding)
Best,
Guowei
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:36 PM Yingjie Cao wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-184 [1] which was
> discussed in [2] [3]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hours
> until 7.21 unless there is an objection.
>
> [1]
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confl
xiechenling created FLINK-23420:
---
Summary: sql stream mode lag function
java.lang.NullPointerException
Key: FLINK-23420
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23420
Project: Flink
Is
+1 (non-binding)
Best,
Jin
Guowei Ma 于2021年7月19日周一 上午9:41写道:
> +1(binding)
>
> Best,
> Guowei
>
>
> On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 5:36 PM Yingjie Cao
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-184 [1] which was
> > discussed in [2] [3]. The vote will be open for at least 72 hour
Dian Fu created FLINK-23421:
---
Summary: Unify the space handling in RowData CSV parser
Key: FLINK-23421
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23421
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Hi,
I'm very sorry to participate in this discussion so late. But I have a
little question. I understand the goal of this FLIP is to make `Writer`
support asynchronous. But my question is: why not let `Committer` support
asynchronization? If only `Writer` supports asynchronization, ExactlyOnce
is i
+1 (binding)
- verified checksums & signatures
- built from sources
- run example jobs with standalone and native k8s deployments
Thank you~
Xintong Song
On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 4:49 PM Yun Tang wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version 1.13
+1 (binding)
- verified checksums & signatures
- built from sources
- run example jobs with standalone and native k8s deployments
Thank you~
Xintong Song
On Thu, Jul 15, 2021 at 6:53 PM Jingsong Li wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Please review and vote on the release candidate #2 for the version
Hi Becket,
Thanks for taking a look at the FLIP page.
I just updated it to include the classes that are user facing, i.e. those
that a user would interact with when using the HybridSource. I also updated
the examples in the HybridSource code block to show both of the scenarios,
fixed start positi
silence created FLINK-23422:
---
Summary: window function not support in window agg function
Key: FLINK-23422
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-23422
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Bug
Dear devs,
We recently discovered that StreamStatus and Idleness is insufficiently
defined [1], so I drafted a FLIP [3] to amend that situation. It would be
good to hear more opinions on that matter. Ideally, we can make the changes
to 1.14 as some newly added methods are affected.
Best,
Arvid
Hi everyone,
I created a FLIP and started a discussion around that topic [1].
Best,
Arvid
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8357d64b9cfdf5a233c53a20d9ac62b75c07c925ce2c43e162f1e39c%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
On Thu, Jun 10, 2021 at 9:18 PM Eron Wright
wrote:
> I quickly updated the
Hi everyone,
I created a FLIP and started a discussion around that topic [1].
Best,
Arvid
[1]
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/r8357d64b9cfdf5a233c53a20d9ac62b75c07c925ce2c43e162f1e39c%40%3Cdev.flink.apache.org%3E
On Tue, Jun 8, 2021 at 11:46 PM Eron Wright
wrote:
> Thanks, the narrowed
16 matches
Mail list logo