Hey,
I would like to raise a concern about implementation of the final
checkpoints taking into account operators/functions that are implementing
two phase commit (2pc) protocol for exactly-once processing with some
external state (kept outside of the Flink). Primarily exactly-once sinks.
First of
Roman Khachatryan created FLINK-21367:
-
Summary: Support objectReuse in JDBC sink
Key: FLINK-21367
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21367
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improv
Thanks for the feedback everyone. If there are no objections, I would
like to continue with the voting now. We can still discuss class names
or package locations during the implementation. But as far as I can see
everyone agrees about the general proposition of this FLIP to improve
the schema d
Chesnay Schepler created FLINK-21368:
Summary: Consider removing RpcService#getExecutor
Key: FLINK-21368
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21368
Project: Flink
Issue Type:
Hi everyone,
I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-164 [1] which was discussed in [2].
The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any
objections, I'll close it by February 17th, 2021 (due to weekend) if we
have received sufficient votes.
[1]
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/
+1 (binding)
Best,
Dawid
On 12/02/2021 13:33, Timo Walther wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-164 [1] which was discussed in [2].
>
> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Unless there are any
> objections, I'll close it by February 17th, 2021 (due to weekend) if
>
Hi Piotr,
Thank you for raising your concern. Unfortunately, I do not have a better
idea than doing closing of operators intermittently with checkpoints (=
multiple last checkpoints).
However, two ideas on how to improve the overall user experience:
1. If an operator is not relying on notifyCheck
+1 (binding)
Best,
Jark
> 2021年2月12日 20:37,Dawid Wysakowicz 写道:
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
>
> Dawid
>
> On 12/02/2021 13:33, Timo Walther wrote:
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'd like to start a vote on FLIP-164 [1] which was discussed in [2].
>>
>> The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. Un
Hi Shengkai,
thanks for updating the FLIP.
I have one last comment for the option `table.execution.mode`. Should we
already use the global Flink option `execution.runtime-mode` instead?
We are using Flink's options where possible (e.g. `pipeline.name` and
`parallism.default`) why not also fo
Seth Wiesman created FLINK-21369:
Summary: Document Checkpoint Storage
Key: FLINK-21369
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21369
Project: Flink
Issue Type: Improvement
谢波 created FLINK-21370:
--
Summary: flink-1.12.1 - JDBCExecutionOptions defaults config
JDBCDynamicTableFactory default config is not consistent
Key: FLINK-21370
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-21370
11 matches
Mail list logo