Re: [FLINK-4704 ] Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table

Hi Anton, sorry, it seems that I was misinformed. The feature freeze might happen next week already. Do you think you can work on this issue this week or beginning of next week? Feel free to assign it to you. Regards, Timo Am 05/12/16 um 09:37 schrieb Anton Mushin: Hi Timo, Ok. In this

[DISCUSS] "Who's hiring on Flink" monthly thread in the mailing lists?

Hi folks, I'd like to see how the community feels about a monthly "Who is hiring on Flink" email thread on the dev@ and user@ mailing lists where folks can post job positions related to Flink. I personally think that posting individual job offerings in the mailing list is off-topic (hence I have

Re: [DISCUSS] "Who's hiring on Flink" monthly thread in the mailing lists?

+1. It keeps it both organized and to a reasonable minimum overhead. Would you volunteer for starting the mail thread each month then, Kostas? Best, Marton On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Kostas Tzoumas wrote: > Hi folks, > > I'd like to see how the community feels about a monthly "Who is hir

Re: [DISCUSS] "Who's hiring on Flink" monthly thread in the mailing lists?

yes, of course! On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 12:54 PM, Márton Balassi wrote: > +1. It keeps it both organized and to a reasonable minimum overhead. > > Would you volunteer for starting the mail thread each month then, Kostas? > > Best, > > Marton > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 6:42 AM, Kostas Tzoumas > w

Re: [DISCUSS] Schedule and Scope for Flink 1.2

Hey Robert, thanks for bringing the discussion up again. On Mon, Dec 5, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Robert Metzger wrote: > - UNRESOLVED Unify Savepoints and Checkpoints (FLINK-4484) This issue/FLIP contained two parts: 1. Write periodic checkpoints out to external storage 2. Allow periodic scheduling

RE: [FLINK-4704 ] Move Table API to org.apache.flink.table

Hi Timo, I try implement issue tomorrow and create PR. Best regards, Anton Mushin -Original Message- From: Timo Walther [mailto:twal...@apache.org] Sent: Tuesday, December 06, 2016 2:42 PM To: dev@flink.apache.org Cc: Anton Mushin Subject: Re: [FLINK-4704 ] Move Table API to org.apache.

Re: [DISCUSS] Schedule and Scope for Flink 1.2

Thanks Robert for bringing this up again. Would be great to come to that @use: I'll take a look at https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/2752 Considering "UNRESOLVED Provide support for asynchronous operations over streams (FLINK-4391)" - that is currently in the hands of the contributor. I would

Re: [DISCUSS] Schedule and Scope for Flink 1.2

Hi Robert, The state of (FLINK-4797) Add Flink 1.1 savepoint backwards compatibility is as follows: We have identified 5 major steps: 1) Convert savepoint format, task state, state handles, etc. 2) Convert binary format of keyed state backends (Rocks, Heap, Fs) 3) Introduce a first step for for

Re: [DISCUSS] Schedule and Scope for Flink 1.2

Hi Robert, I agree with Stefan on the estimation about 4. As for the testing, this can already start, as some basic operators have already been ported. Kostas > On Dec 6, 2016, at 5:50 PM, Stefan Richter > wrote: > > e already restored a job with general window operator and kafka source in a

[jira] [Created] (FLINK-5267) TaskManager logs not scrollable

Mischa Krüger created FLINK-5267: Summary: TaskManager logs not scrollable Key: FLINK-5267 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-5267 Project: Flink Issue Type: Bug Compo

Re: [DISCUSS] Merging the FLIP-6 feature branch into the Master branch

I've reactivated the 1.2 release thread and the actual list of release blockers is quite short as it seems. We could actually manage to fork off a branch for the 1.2 release next week (this really depends on how fast we get the blockers down) Would it be okay for the people working on "flip-6" to w

Re: [DISCUSS] Schedule and Scope for Flink 1.2

Thank you all for your responses so far. The situation is better than I expected :) Let me summarize, and please object if you disagree: - RESOLVED dynamic Scaling / Key Groups (FLINK-3755) - RESOLVED Add Rescalable Non-Partitioned State (FLINK-4379) - RESOLVED [Split for 1.3] Add Flink 1.1 savep

Re: [DISCUSS] Schedule and Scope for Flink 1.2

>>Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930) The PR for the work is still under review and I hope this could be included in the release. Regards, Vijay Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 6, 2016, at 11:51 AM, Robert Metzger wrote: > > UNRESOLVED Secure Data Access (FLINK-3930)

Travis build broken on missing licenses

The travis build is currently broken, if noone has fixed it yet then I will push the fix for it. https://travis-ci.org/apache/flink/builds/181765492 The following files have missing licenses: flink-runtime-web/web-dashboard/assets/images/browserconfig.xml flink-runtime-web/web-dashboard/assets/i

Re: Monitoring backpressure

Hey Stephan, My company (OpsClarity) is building monitoring integration for flink, and being that backpressure is one of the most critical concepts in a streaming system, we need a way to expose backpressure state to a monitoring system (such as ours). I see that the flink-ui has a way to sample

Re: Travis build broken on missing licenses

Done, my Travis build came in all green: https://travis-ci.org/mbalassi/flink/builds/181809550 The hotfix is pushed. On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Márton Balassi wrote: > The travis build is currently broken, if noone has fixed it yet then I > will push the fix for it. > > https://travis-ci.

Re: Travis build broken on missing licenses

Thanks Marton! 2016-12-07 2:49 GMT+01:00 Márton Balassi : > Done, my Travis build came in all green: > > https://travis-ci.org/mbalassi/flink/builds/181809550 > > The hotfix is pushed. > > On Tue, Dec 6, 2016 at 5:08 PM, Márton Balassi > wrote: > > > The travis build is currently broken, if noon