Hey Gyula!
You are right that in this case the memory snapshots go to the job
manager and are part of the save point. The docs seem to be off there.
The whole save point backend and pointer business should be removed
though in favour of making save points self contained and always go to
files. I
Not sure about that. Maybe Ufuk can chime in.
On Fri, 27 May 2016 at 19:40 Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Not if the savepoint backend is Filesystem, right? So it shouldnt really be
> a matter of the statebackend, only the savepoint backend.
>
> Gyula
>
> On Fri, May 27, 2016, 18:47 Aljoscha Krettek wrote
Not if the savepoint backend is Filesystem, right? So it shouldnt really be
a matter of the statebackend, only the savepoint backend.
Gyula
On Fri, May 27, 2016, 18:47 Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> Hi,
> theoretically, it could work (if I'm not missing anything). But the
> savepoint would be lost a
Hi,
theoretically, it could work (if I'm not missing anything). But the
savepoint would be lost as soon as the JobManager is shut down.
Cheers,
Aljoscha
On Fri, 27 May 2016 at 18:09 Gyula Fóra wrote:
> Hey!
>
> The flink docs on savepoints say that they cannot be used in combination
> with the
Hey!
The flink docs on savepoints say that they cannot be used in combination
with the memory statebackend as the savepoint backend will only store
pointers to the state.
If i understand correctly these pointers are the StateHandles that are
stored by the JobManager. In case of the Memory state
