Hi, Timo. Sorry to bother you. There's something I really need to hear your
thoughts on.
When I'm trying to split this flip, having reviewed this discussion and the
FLIP document again, I realized that there is still a key issue that hasn't
been clarified. The key reason the original FLIP is
Hi, Timo, thanks for your advice.
I am considering splitting the existing flip into two while leaving the
existing flip (or without).
One of them points to the completion of the operator about window tvf to
support CDC (there are several
small work items, such as window agg, window rank, wind
Hi, Timo, Sergey and Lincoln Lee. Thanks for your feedback.
> In my opinion the FLIP touches too many
> topics at the same time and should be split into multiple FLIPs. We > should
> stay focused on what is needed for Flink 2.0.
The main goal and topic of this Flip is to align the abilities betw
Hi, Jim.
>As a clarification, since FLINK-24204 is finishing up work from
>FLIP-145[1], do we need to discuss anything before you work out the details
>of FLINK-24024 as a PR?
Which issue do you mean? It seems that FLINK-24204[1] is the issue with table
api&sql type system.
> I've got a PR up [3
Hi, Feng and David.
Thank you very much to share your thoughts.
This flip does not include the official exposure of these experimental conf to
users. Thus there is not adetailed description of this part.
However, in view that some technical users may have added these experimental
conf in actu
