.
Now, the FLIP looks good to me.
Best regards,
Yuxia
发件人: "zhangmang1"
收件人: luoyu...@alumni.sjtu.edu.cn
抄送: "dev" , "Martijn Visser" ,
imj...@gmail.com
发送时间: 星期二, 2022年 7 月 05日 上午 11:35:35
主题: Re:Re: Re: Re: Re:Re: [DISCUSS] FLIP-218: Support SELECT clause in CR
Hi yuxia,
I updated the FLIP and adjusted your concern for RTAS and AtomicCatalog, not
sure if it solved your concern, looking forward to your reply!
--
Best regards,
Mang Zhang
At 2022-07-05 11:26:22, "Jark Wu" wrote:
>Thanks for the update, the FLIP looks good to me now.
>
>Best,
>
Thanks for the update, the FLIP looks good to me now.
Best,
Jark
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 10:57, Mang Zhang wrote:
> Hi Jark,
> Regarding the two issues of concern to yuxia, we did some offline
> discussions and adjusted the implementation plan.
>
> >1) RTAS
> RTAS is not supported in FLIP, so we
Hi Jark,
Regarding the two issues of concern to yuxia, we did some offline discussions
and adjusted the implementation plan.
>1) RTAS
RTAS is not supported in FLIP, so we will remove rtas from option name and do
option forward compatibility when it is supported in the future.
>2) AtomicCatal
Hi Mang,
I'm not sure whether your response has addressed Yuxia's concern or not.
Would be better to receive a confirmation from participants before starting
the vote.
Actually, I have the same feeling with Yuxia's reply.
1) RTAS
If it's hard to have a consistent behavior for RTAS between stream
Hi Martijn,
Thank you for your reply, these are two good questions.
>1. The FLIP mentions that if the user doesn't specify the WITH option part
>in the query of the sink table, it will be assumed that the user wants to
>create a managed table. What will happen if the user doesn't have Table
>Store
Hi Mang,
I have two questions/remarks:
1. The FLIP mentions that if the user doesn't specify the WITH option part
in the query of the sink table, it will be assumed that the user wants to
create a managed table. What will happen if the user doesn't have Table
Store configured/installed? Will we t
Hi Yuxia,
Thank you very much for your reply.
>1: Also, the mixture of ctas and rtas confuses me as the FLIP talks nothing
>about rtas but refer it in the configuration suddenly. And if we're not to
>implement rtas in this FLIP, it may be better not to refer it and the `rtas`
>shouldn't expos
Hi, Martijn
Thanks for your reply!
I looked at the SQL standard, CTAS is part of the SQL standard.
Feature T172 is "AS subquery clause in table definition".
--
Best regards,
Mang Zhang
At 2022-05-04 21:49:00, "Martijn Visser" wrote:
>Hi everyone,
>
>Can we identify if this proposed syntax
Hi, Yuxia
Thanks for your reply!
About the question 1, we will not support, FLIP-218[1] is to simplify the
complexity of user DDL and make it easier for users to use. I have never
encountered this case in a big data.
About the question 2, we will provide a public API like below public void
clean
10 matches
Mail list logo
