Hi yuxia,
I updated the FLIP and adjusted your concern for RTAS and AtomicCatalog, not
sure if it solved your concern, looking forward to your reply!
--
Best regards,
Mang Zhang
At 2022-07-05 11:26:22, "Jark Wu" wrote:
>Thanks for the update, the FLIP looks good to me now.
>
>Best,
>
Thanks for the update, the FLIP looks good to me now.
Best,
Jark
On Tue, 5 Jul 2022 at 10:57, Mang Zhang wrote:
> Hi Jark,
> Regarding the two issues of concern to yuxia, we did some offline
> discussions and adjusted the implementation plan.
>
> >1) RTAS
> RTAS is not supported in FLIP, so we
Hi Jark,
Regarding the two issues of concern to yuxia, we did some offline discussions
and adjusted the implementation plan.
>1) RTAS
RTAS is not supported in FLIP, so we will remove rtas from option name and do
option forward compatibility when it is supported in the future.
>2) AtomicCatal
Hi Mang,
I'm not sure whether your response has addressed Yuxia's concern or not.
Would be better to receive a confirmation from participants before starting
the vote.
Actually, I have the same feeling with Yuxia's reply.
1) RTAS
If it's hard to have a consistent behavior for RTAS between stream
Hi Mang,
I have two questions/remarks:
1. The FLIP mentions that if the user doesn't specify the WITH option part
in the query of the sink table, it will be assumed that the user wants to
create a managed table. What will happen if the user doesn't have Table
Store configured/installed? Will we t
