Re: Question about limitations of iterative algorithms

2015-11-05 Thread Vasiliki Kalavri
Hi Andre, I'm happy you were able to solve your problem :) Improvements to the documentation are always welcome! To me ST != WT is straight-forward from the javadocs, but I guess it wouldn't hurt to stress it in the docs. Do you think you could simplify your implementation a bit to make for a nic

Re: Question about limitations of iterative algorithms

2015-11-05 Thread André Petermann
Hi Vasia! Many thanks for your reply! Your hints finally enabled me implementing the problems first-choice solution using delta iteration: https://gist.github.com/p3et/12deb7d6321b48e9efab Do you think this could be worth to be contributed as an example within the Flink documentation? The exa

Re: Question about limitations of iterative algorithms

2015-11-04 Thread Vasiliki Kalavri
Hi Andre, On 4 November 2015 at 16:04, André Petermann < peterm...@informatik.uni-leipzig.de> wrote: > Hi Fabian, > > thanks for your fast reply! > > I created a gist to explain the while-not-empty loop in more detail: > https://gist.github.com/p3et/9f6e56cf0b68213e3e2b > > It is an approach to c

Re: Question about limitations of iterative algorithms

2015-11-04 Thread André Petermann
Hi Fabian, thanks for your fast reply! I created a gist to explain the while-not-empty loop in more detail: https://gist.github.com/p3et/9f6e56cf0b68213e3e2b It is an approach to create a minimal example of the kind of algorithm corresponding to page 1 of the PDF, in particular frequent substr

Re: Question about limitations of iterative algorithms

2015-11-03 Thread Fabian Hueske
Hi Andre, Thanks for reaching out to the Flink community! I am not sure your analysis is based on correct assumptions about Flink's delta iterations. Flink's delta iterations do support - working and solution sets of different types - worksets that grow and shrink or are completely replaced in ea