rogress in FLINK-5725,.
> It would be great if you can share your ideas about the implementions.
>
> Thanks very much.
> Yuhong
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Shaoxuan Wang [mailto:wshaox...@gmail.com]
> 发送时间: 2017年5月17日 22:48
> 收件人: Dev
> 主题: Re: Proposal about inner join
: Shaoxuan Wang [mailto:wshaox...@gmail.com]
发送时间: 2017年5月17日 22:48
收件人: Dev
主题: Re: Proposal about inner join in Flink
Hello Xingcan,
Thanks for the proposal. It seems (I may miss something) the proposed
semantics&approach for unbounded inner join is similar as the one proposed in
FLINK-5878.
I did
Hello Xingcan,
Thanks for the proposal. It seems (I may miss something) the proposed
semantics&approach for unbounded inner join is similar as the one proposed
in FLINK-5878.
I did not create the PR for FLINK-5878, as the implementation for inner
join is closely associated with "Retract" (proposed