I couldn't have a look at it earlier, because the Wiki was down. Very nice
overview of the flow of things. I like the text and pictures a lot.
I will add content about:
1) The way that we do the network transfers with Netty
2) A more detailed message flow for pipelined vs. blocking results.
I
Very insightful post. Thank you!
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 5:30 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> I wrote some internal documentation for Akka and the distributed
> communication [1].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Till
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Akka+and+Actors
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 a
Very nice post, Till!
We are starting to get much better with this...
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 6:45 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Awesome, thanks Till
>
> On Saturday, March 21, 2015, Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
> > I wrote some internal documentation for Akka and the distributed
> > communication [1].
Awesome, thanks Till
On Saturday, March 21, 2015, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> I wrote some internal documentation for Akka and the distributed
> communication [1].
>
> Cheers,
>
> Till
>
> [1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Akka+and+Actors
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Henry
I wrote some internal documentation for Akka and the distributed
communication [1].
Cheers,
Till
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Akka+and+Actors
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:31 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Ah the Tweet infra bot just announce extended downtime for Confluence
Ah the Tweet infra bot just announce extended downtime for Confluence [1]
- Henry
[1] https://twitter.com/infrabot/status/578983473970475008
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:27 AM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> For me as well. Earlier today it said "down for maintenance"
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:14 PM,
For me as well. Earlier today it said "down for maintenance"
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:14 PM, Kostas Tzoumas wrote:
> it's down for me as well
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Henry Saputra
> wrote:
>
> > Is the wiki down for any of you?
> >
> > I can't access
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/c
it's down for me as well
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 7:12 PM, Henry Saputra
wrote:
> Is the wiki down for any of you?
>
> I can't access
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Apache+Flink+Home
>
> 404
>
> - Henry
>
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Kostas Tzoumas
> wrote:
> > I added
Is the wiki down for any of you?
I can't access
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Apache+Flink+Home
404
- Henry
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:46 AM, Kostas Tzoumas wrote:
> I added a document for data exchange between tasks:
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Data
I don't think so. But adding new contributors wiki username to edit is
much easier to merging changes to website, I hope.
- Henry
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 8:53 AM, Maximilian Michels wrote:
> +1 for the initiative and for the wiki.
>
> At the moment, the wiki's barrier to entry is like the git re
+1 for the initiative and for the wiki.
At the moment, the wiki's barrier to entry is like the git repository's.
Contributors need to explicitly ask comitters for access to the wiki. Is
there a way we could open up the wiki for contributors without having to
face too much spam? (e.g. have changes
Thanks. I will have a look later :-)
+1 for the Wiki. I think the low overhead does not only make it easier to
contribute for newcomers, but for committers as well. :-)
On 20 Mar 2015, at 12:46, Kostas Tzoumas wrote:
> I added a document for data exchange between tasks:
> https://cwiki.apache.
I added a document for data exchange between tasks:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Data+exchange+between+tasks
Feel free to edit. I plan to link the class names to the class files in
github.
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 11:17 AM, Kostas Tzoumas
wrote:
> +1 for the Wiki.
>
> When t
+1 for the Wiki.
When these have been stabilized we can move them to the docs if we decide
to do so.
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 10:07 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> I have put my suggested version of an outline for the docs into the wiki.
> Regardless where the docs end up (wiki or repository), we can
I have put my suggested version of an outline for the docs into the wiki.
Regardless where the docs end up (wiki or repository), we can use the wiki
to outline the docs.
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLINK/Flink+Internals
Some pages contain some stub or outline, others are completel
I think the Wiki has a much lower barrier of entry to fix docs, especially
for external people. The docs, with the Jekyll setup, is rather tricky.
I would very much like that all kinds of people contribute to the docs
about the internals, not just the usual three suspects that have done this
so far
Why do you wan't to split stuff between the doc in the repository and
the wiki. I for one would always be to lazy to check stuff in a wiki
when there is also a documentation. Plus, this would lead to
additional overhead in deciding what goes where and syncing between
the two places for documentatio
Ah, I totally forgot to add to the internals:
- Fault tolerance in Batch mode
- Fault Tolerance in Streaming Mode, with state handling
On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 7:51 PM, Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Hi all!
>
> I would like to kick of an effort to improve the documentation of the
> Flink Architectu
18 matches
Mail list logo
