Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-09 Thread Roman Khachatryan
Hi everyone, FLINK-26985 was just merged. Sorry for the long delay. Regards, Roman On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 11:52 AM Yuan Mei wrote: > > FLINK-26985 was discovered just before last weekend. > > We will get it resolved first thing after the holiday (tomorrow). > > Best > Yuan > > On Tue, Apr 5, 2

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-05 Thread Yuan Mei
FLINK-26985 was discovered just before last weekend. We will get it resolved first thing after the holiday (tomorrow). Best Yuan On Tue, Apr 5, 2022 at 5:37 PM Yun Gao wrote: > Hi Robert, > > Very sorry for the long delay before the rc1 could be published. > > For the open critical issues, I p

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-05 Thread Yun Gao
Hi Robert, Very sorry for the long delay before the rc1 could be published. For the open critical issues, I previously checked with the owners of the issues that they are optional to the release, thus the only blocker issue is the FLINK-26985. Besides to the blocker issues we are waiting for

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync

2022-04-04 Thread Robert Metzger
Thanks a lot for the update. >From the burndown board [1] it seems that there's only one blocker left, which has already a fix in review [2]. Are we also planning to address the open Critical tickets before opening the first voting release candidate? When do you expect 1.15 to be out? [1] https:/

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-14 Thread Johannes Moser
Hi Gabor, We will cut the branch today. Best, Joe > On 11.03.2022, at 13:19, Gabor Somogyi wrote: > > Any news on the branch cut? The listed jira-s are closed as I see. > > G > > > On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:02 PM Galen Warren wrote: > >> You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-11 Thread Gabor Somogyi
Any news on the branch cut? The listed jira-s are closed as I see. G On Tue, Mar 8, 2022 at 3:02 PM Galen Warren wrote: > You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing steps on my > contribution -- [FLINK-26451] Test GCS FileSystem w/ RecoverableWriter > manually - ASF JIRA (apache.org)

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-08 Thread Galen Warren
You're welcome. Fwiw, I've also run through testing steps on my contribution -- [FLINK-26451] Test GCS FileSystem w/ RecoverableWriter manually - ASF JIRA (apache.org) -- but I don't think I'm supposed to be officially doing manually testing on my

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-08 Thread Johannes Moser
Thanks so much Gabor and Galen. Very much appreciated. > On 07.03.2022, at 19:00, Galen Warren wrote: > > I just ran through the testing steps on [FLINK-26462] Release Testing: > Running Python UDF in different Execution Mode - ASF JIRA (apache.org) >

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-07 Thread Galen Warren
I just ran through the testing steps on [FLINK-26462] Release Testing: Running Python UDF in different Execution Mode - ASF JIRA (apache.org) . Everything worked but I think there might be a typo in the steps to set up the tests, I left a comment

Re: Flink 1.15 Stabilisation Sync skipped tomorrow

2022-03-07 Thread Gabor Somogyi
Since I know this area I help to test FLINK-26468 . G On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 5:15 PM Johannes Moser wrote: > Hello, > > We will skip tomorrows weekly stabilisation sync. > It looks like all blockers are assigned and worked on. A significant > n