Re: FLIP-484: Add custom metric variables to operators

2024-12-06 Thread Piotr Nowojski
I hope my previous message has clarified the questions. If there are no further comments, I will open a voting thread later today. Best, Piotrek wt., 3 gru 2024 o 12:18 Piotr Nowojski napisał(a): > Hi Romand and Hongshun, > > > 1. The scope of the variables added - is it only the last transfor

Re: FLIP-484: Add custom metric variables to operators

2024-12-03 Thread Piotr Nowojski
Hi Romand and Hongshun, > 1. The scope of the variables added - is it only the last transformation? > Do I understand correctly, that chaining does NOT affect this scoping? > Could you please give a more detailed example how to do it? Currently, the > example only shows source. Setting the scope

Re: FLIP-484: Add custom metric variables to operators

2024-12-02 Thread Hongshun Wang
Hi Piotr, thanks for the proposal. > it would be helpful to group metrics from each source/sink instance together, Could you please give a more detailed example how to do it? Currently, the example only shows source. Thanks, Hongshun On Thu, Nov 14, 2024 at 8:36 PM Roman Khachatryan wrote:

Re: FLIP-484: Add custom metric variables to operators

2024-11-14 Thread Roman Khachatryan
Hi Piotr, thanks for the proposal, Can you please clarify 1. The scope of the variables added - is it only the last transformation? Do I understand correctly, that chaining does NOT affect this scoping? 2. Is Python API going to be supported as well? Thanks Regards, Roman On Thu, Nov 7, 2024