That is a good point Ufuk. Will add the note.
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 2:03 PM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> The website has been updated for 1.0.1. :-)
>
> @Till: If you don't mention it in the post, it makes sense to have a
> note at the end of the post saying that the code examples only work
> with 1.0
The website has been updated for 1.0.1. :-)
@Till: If you don't mention it in the post, it makes sense to have a
note at the end of the post saying that the code examples only work
with 1.0.1.
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:35 PM, Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Thanks a lot to all for the valuable feedback. I
Thanks a lot to all for the valuable feedback. I've incorporated your
suggestions and will publish the article, once Flink 1.0.1 has been
released (we need 1.0.1 to run the example code).
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:29 AM, gen tang wrote:
> It is really a good article. Please put it
Made a few suggestions. Reads well, Till!
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:10 AM, Ufuk Celebi wrote:
> Same here.
>
> +1 to publish
>
> On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
>> Hi,
>> I like it. Very dense and very focused on the example but I think it should
>> be good for the Flink
Same here.
+1 to publish
On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 10:04 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote:
> Hi,
> I like it. Very dense and very focused on the example but I think it should
> be good for the Flink Blog.
>
> --
> aljoscha
>
> On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 at 15:56 Till Rohrmann wrote:
>
>> Hi Flink community,
>>
Hi,
I like it. Very dense and very focused on the example but I think it should
be good for the Flink Blog.
--
aljoscha
On Fri, 1 Apr 2016 at 15:56 Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Hi Flink community,
>
> I've written a short blog [1] post about Flink's new CEP library which
> basically showcases its fun
