Hi, Kurt
Thank you very much for your suggestion.
I have studied the design documentation of FLIP-63. I have
no comments here.
With your suggestion from the previous few days, I am
writing a design documentation about the Bucket FileSystem Table Sink and
considering how to support
-
> *From:* Fabian Hueske
> *Date:* Fri,Sep 20,2019 9:38 PM
> *To:* Jun Zhang <825875...@qq.com>
> *Cc:* dev , user
> *Subject:* Re: Add Bucket File System Table Sink
>
> Hi Jun,
>
> Thank you very much for your contribution.
>
> I think a Bucketing F
Hi??Fabian ??
Thank you very much for your suggestion. This is when I use flink sql to write
data to hdfs at work. I feel that it is inconvenient. I wrote this function,
and then I want to contribute it to the community. This is my first PR , some
processes may not be clear, I am very sorry.
Hi Jun,
Thank you very much for your contribution.
I think a Bucketing File System Table Sink would be a great addition.
Our code contribution guidelines [1] recommend to discuss the design with
the community before opening a PR.
First of all, this ensures that the design is aligned with Flink's
3 and see if there is a better solution to
> combine these two functions. I am very willing to join this development.
>
>
>
> -- 原始邮件 --
> *发件人:* "Kurt Young";
> *发送时间:* 2019年9月17日(星期二) 中午11:19
> *收件人:* "Jun Zhang"<825875..
Thanks. Let me clarify a bit more about my thinkings. Generally, I would
prefer we can concentrate the functionalities about connector, especially
some standard & most popular connectors, like kafka, different file
system with different formats, etc. We should make these core connectors
as powerful
Hi Jun,
Thanks for bringing this up, in general I'm +1 on this feature. As
you might know, there is another ongoing efforts about such kind
of table sink, which covered in newly proposed partition support
reworking[1]. In this proposal, we also want to introduce a new
file system connector, which
