Thanks all, this vote is now closed. I will announce the results in another
thread.
On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 6:56 PM Danny Cranmer
wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> - Release notes look good
> - Source archive signature/checksum are correct
> - Binary (from Maven) signature/checksum are correct
> - Built
+1 (binding)
- Release notes look good
- Source archive signature/checksum are correct
- Binary (from Maven) signature/checksum are correct
- Built from source locally and tests pass
- Tag exists in Github
- Contents of maven repo is correct
Thanks,
Danny
Thanks for driving the new release!
+1 (binding)
- Verified signature and checksum
- Built from source locally
- Reviewed release note and web PR
Best,
Qingsheng
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 7:45 PM Leonard Xu wrote:
> Thanks Danny and Jiabao for driving the work!
>
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> - built fro
Thanks Danny and Jiabao for driving the work!
+1 (binding)
- built from source code succeeded
- verified signatures
- verified hashsums
- checked release notes
- reviewed the web PR
Best,
Leonard
> On Aug 6, 2023, at 6:58 PM, Ahmed Hamdy wrote:
>
> Thanks Danny
> + 1 (non-binding)
>
> *
Thanks Danny
+ 1 (non-binding)
* Signature and checksums are matching.
* Source Code builds locally.
* Web PR looks good.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 4 Aug 2023 at 17:44, Jiabao Sun
wrote:
> Thanks Danny,
>
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> - Build and compile the source code locally
> - Tag exists
Thanks Danny,
+1 (non-binding)
- Build and compile the source code locally
- Tag exists in Github
- Checked release notes
- Source archive signature/checksum looks good
- Binary (from Maven) signature/checksum looks good
- Checked the contents contains jar and pom files in apache repo
Non blocki
