Thanks everyone for the support. This vote is now closed, I will
announce the results in a separate email.
Danny.
On Thu, Nov 30, 2023 at 5:20 AM Samrat Deb wrote:
> Hi danny ,
>
> +1 (non binding)
>
> Release notes look good
> - Signatures and checksums verified
> - pom versions checked
> - So
Hi danny ,
+1 (non binding)
Release notes look good
- Signatures and checksums verified
- pom versions checked
- Source build and tests verified
Bests,
Samrat
On Wed, 29 Nov 2023 at 12:11 PM, Leonard Xu wrote:
> Thanks Danny for driving this, sorry for late verification.
>
> +1 (binding)
>
>
Thanks Danny for driving this, sorry for late verification.
+1 (binding)
- built from source code succeeded
- verified signatures
- verified hashsums
- checked the contents contains jar and pom files in apache repo
- checked Github release tag
- reviewed the web PR with minor comment
Best,
Le
Hi Danny
+1 (non-binding)
- Verified signatures and checksums
- verified no binaries exists in archive
- built source
- reviewed web PR
- Ran E2E example with Kinesis, Firehose & DynamoDB datastream connectors.
Best Regards
Ahmed Hamdy
On Fri, 24 Nov 2023 at 08:38, Martijn Visser
wrote:
> Hi
Hi Danny,
Thanks for driving this.
+1 (binding)
- Validated hashes
- Verified signature
- Verified that no binaries exist in the source archive
- Build the source with Maven
- Verified licenses
- Verified web PRs
On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 12:29 PM Jiabao Sun
wrote:
>
> Thanks Danny for driving t
Thanks Danny for driving the release,
+1 (non-binding)
- built from source code succeeded
- verified signatures
- verified hashsums
- checked release notes
Best,
Jiabao
> 2023年11月20日 19:11，Danny Cranmer 写道：
>
> Hello all,
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> - Release notes look good
> - Signatures and
Hello all,
+1 (binding).
- Release notes look good
- Signatures and checksums match
- There are no binaries in the source archive
- pom versions are correct
- Tag is present in Github
- CI passes against FLink 1.17 and 1.18
- Source build and tests pass
Thanks,
Danny
On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 1:15
+1 (non-binding)
- validated shasum
- verified build
- Java 8 - build good and all test cases pass
- Java 11 - build good and all test cases pass
Observations: got test failures with Java 17, something to look for in
future
On Tue, 31 Oct 2023 at 08:42, Danny Cranmer wrote:
> Hi everyo
