Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-20 Thread Yangze Guo
+1 (binding) Best, Yangze Guo On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 2:18 PM Zhu Zhu wrote: > > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Zhu > > Yang Wang 于2022年6月20日周一 10:46写道: > > > > +1(binding) > > > > Best, > > Yang > > > > Yun Gao 于2022年6月17日周五 18:03写道: > > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > > > Thanks for the discussion an

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-19 Thread Zhu Zhu
+1 (binding) Thanks, Zhu Yang Wang 于2022年6月20日周一 10:46写道: > > +1(binding) > > Best, > Yang > > Yun Gao 于2022年6月17日周五 18:03写道: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks for the discussion and updates! > > > > Best, > > Yun Gao > > > > > > -

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-19 Thread Yang Wang
+1(binding) Best, Yang Yun Gao 于2022年6月17日周五 18:03写道: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks for the discussion and updates! > > Best, > Yun Gao > > > -- > From:Peter Huang > Send Time:2022 Jun. 16 (Thu.) 00:05 > To:dev > Subject:Re: [VOTE] F

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-17 Thread Yun Gao
+1 (binding) Thanks for the discussion and updates! Best, Yun Gao -- From:Peter Huang Send Time:2022 Jun. 16 (Thu.) 00:05 To:dev Subject:Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism +1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:55 AM Xintong Song

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-15 Thread Peter Huang
+1 On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 2:55 AM Xintong Song wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Best, > > Xintong > > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jiangang Liu > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > Chesnay Schepler 于2022年6月15日周三 17:15写道: > > > > > +1 > > > > > > On 15/06/2022 10:49, Lijie Wang wrote: > > > > Hi everyone

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-15 Thread Xintong Song
+1 (binding) Best, Xintong On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:30 PM Jiangang Liu wrote: > +1 > > Chesnay Schepler 于2022年6月15日周三 17:15写道: > > > +1 > > > > On 15/06/2022 10:49, Lijie Wang wrote: > > > Hi everyone, > > > > > > We've received some additional concerns since the last vote [1], and > > > t

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-15 Thread Jiangang Liu
+1 Chesnay Schepler 于2022年6月15日周三 17:15写道: > +1 > > On 15/06/2022 10:49, Lijie Wang wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > > > We've received some additional concerns since the last vote [1], and > > therefore made a lot of changes to design. You can find the details in > [2] > > and the discussions in [3

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-15 Thread Chesnay Schepler
+1 On 15/06/2022 10:49, Lijie Wang wrote: Hi everyone, We've received some additional concerns since the last vote [1], and therefore made a lot of changes to design. You can find the details in [2] and the discussions in [3]. Now I'd like to start a new vote thread for FLIP-224. The vote wil

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-08 Thread Chesnay Schepler
I don't really see a strong need for the blocklist in the FLIP-168. It states that we need the block mechanism so that the speculative executions aren't deployed to the slow node. I'm wondering what exactly prevents the scheduler from ensuring that right now, given that we already have other m

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-07 Thread Zhu Zhu
Hi Chesnay, For your information, one major goal of blocklist mechanism is to support FLIP-168(speculative execution of batch jobs). When speculative execution happens, it needs to keep the existing tasks running and launch speculative tasks on other nodes. We have heard request of speculative exe

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-06-07 Thread Chesnay Schepler
I've had some time to think about it and concluded to stick to my -1. While BLOCK_WITH_QUARANTINE is easy to implement (un-register TMs and ignore all RPCs (the latter mostly happens automatically)) it doesn't add a whole lot of value as it's pretty much equivalent with shutting down the TM.

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-05-27 Thread Zhu Zhu
Hi Chesnay, Would you share your thoughts in the discussion thread if there are still concerns? Thanks, Zhu Chesnay Schepler 于2022年5月27日周五 14:54写道: > > -1 to put a lid on things for now, because I'm not quite done yet with > the discussion. > > On 27/05/2022 05:25, Yangze Guo wrote: > > +1 (bin

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-05-26 Thread Chesnay Schepler
-1 to put a lid on things for now, because I'm not quite done yet with the discussion. On 27/05/2022 05:25, Yangze Guo wrote: +1 (binding) Best, Yangze Guo On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:54 PM Yun Gao wrote: Thanks Lijie and Zhu for driving the FLIP! The blocked list functionality helps reduce

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-05-26 Thread Yangze Guo
+1 (binding) Best, Yangze Guo On Thu, May 26, 2022 at 3:54 PM Yun Gao wrote: > > Thanks Lijie and Zhu for driving the FLIP! > > The blocked list functionality helps reduce the complexity in maintenance > and the currently design looks good to me, thus +1 from my side (binding). > > > Best, > Yun

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-05-26 Thread Yun Gao
Thanks Lijie and Zhu for driving the FLIP! The blocked list functionality helps reduce the complexity in maintenance and the currently design looks good to me, thus +1 from my side (binding). Best, Yun -- From:Xintong Song Se

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-224: Blocklist Mechanism

2022-05-25 Thread Xintong Song
Thanks for driving this effort, Lijie. I think a nice addition would be to make this feature accessible directly from webui. However, there's no reason to block this FLIP on it. So +1 (binding) from my side. Best, Xintong On Fri, May 20, 2022 at 12:57 PM Lijie Wang wrote: > Hi everyone, >