Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

+1 (binding) Thanks for the efforts Robert! Best Regards, Yu On Mon, 1 Feb 2021 at 17:19, Matthias Pohl wrote: > Thanks Robert and congratulations on your first FLIP. > +1 (non-binding) > > Matthias > > On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:22 AM Zhu Zhu wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Thanks, > > Zhu

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Thanks Robert and congratulations on your first FLIP. +1 (non-binding) Matthias On Mon, Feb 1, 2021 at 4:22 AM Zhu Zhu wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Thanks, > Zhu > > Till Rohrmann 于2021年1月29日周五 下午10:23写道： > > > LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert! > > > > +1 (binding) > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

+1 (binding) Thanks, Zhu Till Rohrmann 于2021年1月29日周五 下午10:23写道： > LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert! > > +1 (binding) > > Cheers, > Till > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Yang Wang wrote: > > > Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big step > > to make Flink auto s

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

LGTM. Thanks for the work Robert! +1 (binding) Cheers, Till On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 11:27 AM Yang Wang wrote: > Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big step > to make Flink auto scalable. > > +1 (non-binding) > > > Best, > Yang > > Robert Metzger 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Thanks Robert for your great work on this FLIP. This is really a big step to make Flink auto scalable. +1 (non-binding) Best, Yang Robert Metzger 于2021年1月28日周四 下午4:32写道： > @Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If FLIP-160 > is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes,

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

@Yangze: That's something I overlooked. I should have waited. If FLIP-160 is rejected or undergoes fundamental changes, I'll cancel this vote and rewrite FLIP-159. But I have the impression that there were no major concerns regarding FLIP-160 so far. On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 8:46 AM Yangze Guo wro

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Thanks for driving this, Robert! LGTM. +1 minor: Just a little confused about the program. It seems this proposal relies on the FLIP-160, which is still under discussion. Should we always vote for the prerequisite first? Best, Yangze Guo On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 3:27 PM Xintong Song wrote: > >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-159: Reactive Mode

Thanks Robert. LGTM. +1 (binding) Thank you~ Xintong Song On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 2:50 PM Robert Metzger wrote: > Hi all, > > since the discussion [1] about FLIP-159 [2] seems to have reached a > consensus, I'd like to start a formal vote for the FLIP. > > Please vote +1 to approve the FLIP