Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-18 Thread Wei Zhong
Thanks everyone for the votes! I’ll summarize the voting result in a separate email. Best, Wei > 在 2020年3月18日,15:37,zoudan 写道: > > +1 (non-binding) > > Best, > Dan Zou >

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-18 Thread zoudan
+1 (non-binding) Best, Dan Zou

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-17 Thread Dian Fu
+1 (binding) On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 6:56 PM Hequn Cheng wrote: > +1 (binding) > > Best, > Hequn > > > On Mar 17, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Benchao Li wrote: > > > > +1 (non-binding) > > > > BTW it's in the same thread in my gmail too. > > > > > > > > Kurt Young 于2020年3月17日周二 上午11:47写道: > > > >> Looks

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-17 Thread Hequn Cheng
+1 (binding) Best, Hequn > On Mar 17, 2020, at 5:03 PM, Benchao Li wrote: > > +1 (non-binding) > > BTW it's in the same thread in my gmail too. > > > > Kurt Young 于2020年3月17日周二 上午11:47写道: > >> Looks like I hit the gmail's bug again... >> >> Best, >> Kurt >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 a

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-17 Thread Benchao Li
+1 (non-binding) BTW it's in the same thread in my gmail too. Kurt Young 于2020年3月17日周二 上午11:47写道: > Looks like I hit the gmail's bug again... > > Best, > Kurt > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Zhong wrote: > > > Hi Kurt, > > > > This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If th

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-16 Thread Kurt Young
Looks like I hit the gmail's bug again... Best, Kurt On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 11:11 AM Wei Zhong wrote: > Hi Kurt, > > This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is > combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the mail > client. > > Best, > Wei > > [

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-16 Thread Wei Zhong
Hi Kurt, This vote thread is independent from my side[1]. If this thread is combined with another thread from your side, you can try to change the mail client. Best, Wei [1] http://apache-flink-mailing-list-archive.1008284.n3.nabble.com/VOTE-FLIP-106-Support-Python-UDF-in-SQL-Function-DDL-td38

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-16 Thread Kurt Young
Hi, please use a dedicated vote thread. Best, Kurt On Tue, Mar 17, 2020 at 10:36 AM jincheng sun wrote: > +1 > > Best, > Jincheng > > > > Wei Zhong 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道: > > > Hi all, > > > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and > > reached consensus in the

Re: [VOTE] FLIP-106: Support Python UDF in SQL Function DDL

2020-03-16 Thread jincheng sun
+1 Best, Jincheng Wei Zhong 于2020年3月13日周五 下午9:04写道: > Hi all, > > I would like to start the vote for FLIP-106[1] which is discussed and > reached consensus in the discussion thread[2]. > > The vote will be open for at least 72 hours. I'll try to close it by > 2020-03-18 14:00 UTC, unless ther