Re: [QUESTION] thread model in Flink makes me confused

2016-05-12 Thread Wright, Eron
Funny you should say that, because in a recent discussion with Stephan and Jamie, we talked about reworking the web UI to talk to numerous job managers. I’ve been looking into is as part of the Mesos work (FLINK-1984). I’ll start a new thread about it soon. > On May 11, 2016, at 10:38 PM, Al

Re: [QUESTION] thread model in Flink makes me confused

2016-05-12 Thread Flavio Pompermaier
That would be definitely awesome (and useful also for us)! +1 On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Aljoscha Krettek wrote: > I favor the one-cluster-per job approach. If this becomes the dominant > approach to doing things we could also think about introducing a separate > component that would allo

Re: [QUESTION] thread model in Flink makes me confused

2016-05-11 Thread Aljoscha Krettek
I favor the one-cluster-per job approach. If this becomes the dominant approach to doing things we could also think about introducing a separate component that would allow monitoring the jobs in these per-job clusters as is now possible when running multiple jobs in a single cluster. On Thu, 12 Ma

Re: [QUESTION] thread model in Flink makes me confused

2016-05-11 Thread Wright, Eron
One option is to use a separate cluster (JobManager + TaskManagers) for each job. This is fairly straightforward with the YARN support - "flink run” can launch a cluster for a job and tear it down afterwards. Of course this means you must deploy YARN. That doesn’t necessarily imply HDFS tho