Thanks a lot @Chesnay, I would try again.
Chesnay Schepler 于2021年10月29日周五 下午4:21写道：
> When you 'run azure', check the build after a minute or so and you
> should see that the failed job is running again.
>
>
>
> On 29/10/2021 10:19, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
> > It's working just fine. You need to
When you 'run azure', check the build after a minute or so and you
should see that the failed job is running again.
On 29/10/2021 10:19, Chesnay Schepler wrote:
It's working just fine. You need to rebase your branch because on your
branch flink-python is simply broken.
On 29/10/2021 08:57,
It's working just fine. You need to rebase your branch because on your
branch flink-python is simply broken.
On 29/10/2021 08:57, JING ZHANG wrote:
Hi Chesnay,
I meet with something weird.
I submit a pull request https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17571, it
trigger a ci
(https://dev.azure.c
Hi Chesnay,
I meet with something weird.
I submit a pull request https://github.com/apache/flink/pull/17571, it
trigger a ci (
https://dev.azure.com/apache-flink/apache-flink/_build/results?buildId=25470&view=results)
which fails at first time because of python module failure.
I try to run 'run azu
Awesome!
On Tue, Oct 12, 2021 at 3:11 AM Guowei Ma wrote:
> Thanks for your effort!
>
> Best,
> Guowei
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:26 PM Stephan Ewen wrote:
>
> > Great initiative, thanks for doing this!
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:52 AM Till Rohrmann
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks a l
Thanks for your effort!
Best,
Guowei
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 9:26 PM Stephan Ewen wrote:
> Great initiative, thanks for doing this!
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:52 AM Till Rohrmann
> wrote:
>
> > Thanks a lot for this effort Chesnay! The improvements sound really good.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > T
Great initiative, thanks for doing this!
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 10:52 AM Till Rohrmann wrote:
> Thanks a lot for this effort Chesnay! The improvements sound really good.
>
> Cheers,
> Till
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:46 AM David Morávek wrote:
>
> > Nice! Thanks for the effort Chesnay, this
Thanks a lot for this effort Chesnay! The improvements sound really good.
Cheers,
Till
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 8:46 AM David Morávek wrote:
> Nice! Thanks for the effort Chesnay, this is really a huge step forward!
>
> Best,
> D.
>
> On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:02 AM Xintong Song
> wrote:
>
> >
Nice! Thanks for the effort Chesnay, this is really a huge step forward!
Best,
D.
On Mon, Oct 11, 2021 at 6:02 AM Xintong Song wrote:
> Thanks for the effort, @Chesnay. This is super helpful.
>
> @Jing,
> Every push to the PR branch should automatically trigger an entire new
> build. `@flinkbot
Thanks for the effort, @Chesnay. This is super helpful.
@Jing,
Every push to the PR branch should automatically trigger an entire new
build. `@flinkbot run azure` should only be used when you want to re-run
the failed stages without changing the PR. E.g., when running into known
unstable cases tha
Hi Chesnay,
Thanks for the effort. It is a very useful improvement.
I have a minor question. Please forgive me if the question is too naive.
Since '@flinkbot run azure' now behaves like "Rerun failed jobs", is there
any way to trigger an entirely new build? Because some times I'm not sure
the passe
Thanks! "only running the jobs that actually failed" is very useful.
A small problem may have been solved. After a commit, we cannot rerun
the failed test before the commit. (The test triggered by commit has
not finished yet. The test triggered again should run the full cases)
Best,
Jingsong
On
Thanks for that great job, Chesnay! "Rerun failed jobs" will help a lot.
Best,
Yangze Guo
On Sun, Oct 10, 2021 at 4:56 PM Chesnay Schepler wrote:
>
> I made a number of changes to the CiBot over the weekend.
>
> - '@flinkbot run azure' previously triggered an entirely new build based
> on the la
13 matches
Mail list logo
